Dear members of the Hibernate project,
we kindly ask for your participation in our survey on security assurance in
free/open source software.
Security assurances are confidence building activities through structured
design processes, documentation, and testing.
By participating in our survey
Hi guys,
It has been a while since I've talked to most of the Hibernate team -
I hope all is well with everyone. I can say that I miss that I miss
working with the people, not so much the consulting travel :-P
Anyway, lemme get to business.
I upgraded from 3.2.5 to 3.2.6 and started getting
Hi Les,
I also had the same issue which was fixed using an update of the
transaction manager I use (Bitronix 1.3). A light JNDI server is now
embedded in it...
For info, the main developer of Bitronix is also working for Atomikos
(JTA world seems to be small ;-)
My JNDI hibernate.cfg.xml is
Hi Joël,
Thanks for the feedback :)
And I know that works, but I feel like it is a hack. If the
underlying TM doesn't require JNDI, why force it just to get around a
lookup that is meaningless? Also, this would make a lot of other
people happy.
In other words, this problem wasn't in 3.2.5 and
joël Winteregg wrote:
I also had the same issue which was fixed using an update of the
transaction manager I use (Bitronix 1.3). A light JNDI server is now
embedded in it...
This is an alternative that I've discussed with others off list. IMHO,
this better simulates the in-container JTA
Hi again,
And I know that works, but I feel like it is a hack. If the
underlying TM doesn't require JNDI, why force it just to get around a
lookup that is meaningless? Also, this would make a lot of other
people happy.
I agree with you... For me at least (I'm not a J2EE infrastructure
Nope - no coupling required :)
What I'm proposing is purely restricted to Hibernate's existing
dependencies and would work for any TM implementation, not just
Atomikos or JOTM.
It is the TM-specific TransactionManagerLookup (or perhaps a
TM-specific JTATransactionFactory) that would choose the
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi guys,
It has been a while since I've talked to most of the Hibernate team -
I hope all is well with everyone. I can say that I miss that I miss
working with the people, not so much the consulting travel :-P
Anyway, lemme get to business.
I upgraded from 3.2.5 to 3.2.6
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. This is definitely a feature request
and not a bug.
I'll do that and see what you guys think. And if you or Steve want to
squash it, that's fine too, but at least I'm trying :-D
Thanks,
Les
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Chris Bredesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not particularly worried about the name, but my goal is to preserve
compatibility with hibernate, so you can pick up your mapping file, and drop
it into a Java or .NET application with only minor changes (much the same as
you can do with Hibernate = Nhibernate I guess.
I was more chasing some
10 matches
Mail list logo
