Re: [Hibernate] ehcache "out-of-sync" issue..

2005-01-31 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
I did ask Greg Luck to remove the hibernate ehcache provider from the ehcache distribution when I did commit the new one. but I had no answer. Gavin is a commiter for ehcache, he could do the job. Emmanuel Bernard 01.55.21.52.14 Fnac - DSI Direction France - Nouvelles technologies 67, boulevard d

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache and JDK1.4

2003-11-18 Thread Greg Luck
EHCache 0.5 was released today. It has the backport to JDK1.3 and JDK1.2 that has been discussed in this thread included. The Changelog follows: EHCache-0.5 === Bug Fixes - - Implemented not creating a Disk Store when overflowToDisk="false" is set in ehcache.xml - toString() met

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache and JDK1.4

2003-11-15 Thread Gavin King
Great :) Greg Luck wrote: Gavin Done. I have changed logging to commons-logging and have added LRUHashMap from commons-collections. This, along with some packaging changes will be in CVS later today. Greg Luck On 15/11/2003, at 10:08 AM, Gavin King wrote: We already have a dependency to

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache and JDK1.4

2003-11-15 Thread Greg Luck
Gavin Done. I have changed logging to commons-logging and have added LRUHashMap from commons-collections. This, along with some packaging changes will be in CVS later today. Greg Luck On 15/11/2003, at 10:08 AM, Gavin King wrote: We already have a dependency to commons-collections, so perh

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache and JDK1.4

2003-11-15 Thread Juozas Baliuka
Fork and modify this class http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/voruta/voruta/src/java/net/sf/voruta/S oftRefMemoryCache.java It is simple soft cache implementation and emulates LRU. BTW: Suns JVM SoftReference implements LRU algorythm itself . - Original Message - From: "Greg Luck" <

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache and JDK1.4

2003-11-14 Thread Gavin King
We already have a dependency to commons-collections, so perhaps just use commons SequencedHashMap instead of LinkedHashMap. Greg Luck wrote: Hi EHCache does require the use of JDK1.4. Specifically we use: - LinkedHashMap, which provides us with an LRU HashMap - JDK1.4 logging - SoftRefererenc

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache and JDK1.4

2003-11-14 Thread Christian Bauer
On 15 Nov (09:10), Greg Luck wrote: > I was pretty keen to use the java.util.LinkedHashMap, because the > combination of a doubly-linked > list combined with a Hashmap in JCS was the source of the memory leak > in it. The memory store code > went from around 1500 lines down to a few hundred and

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache

2003-11-13 Thread Gavin King
is already deprecated in 2.1 and replaced by David Channon wrote: Now what does this change (and the generalisation) mean to the DTD and all those JCS cache tags? --David. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache

2003-11-13 Thread David Channon
I think its a good idea. Because of the new caching API it does not stop someone using JCS but caching is so important that an active group would be best. BTW: Like the colors they have picked for the logo :-). Now what does this change (and the generalisation) mean to the DTD and all those JCS ca

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache

2003-11-13 Thread Gavin King
Ah, we might want to make sure that EHCache is not 1.4 only. Josh Rehman wrote: http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/documentation/ states "EHCache requires a minimum of JDK1.4, because it relies on some new features of JDK1.4 to simplify the programming." Are you planning on having Hibernate be 1.4+ o

Re: [Hibernate] EHCache

2003-11-13 Thread Christian Bauer
On 13 Nov (19:28), Sandeep Dath wrote: > Perhaps there could also be a *little* more documentation (all supporting > caching frameworks) on caching, and caching best practices? On my desk and will soon be in CVS. -- Christian Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

RE: [Hibernate] EHCache

2003-11-13 Thread Sandeep Dath
Amen to this. Perhaps there could also be a *little* more documentation (all supporting caching frameworks) on caching, and caching best practices? Sandeep -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gavin King Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:18