1. I want to add a new operation persistOnFlush
Remember why we did introduce the PERSIST_ON_FLUSH cascading action? For
EJB3 flush efficiency
In the current impl, it is only used for the first level of flushing in
EJB3 (ie action inherited from FlushEventListener.getCascadingAction()
To workar
Hi,
yes - there is alot more "weird" limitations, but Derby is not alone in
that
aspect (db2 comes to mind ;) But the turnaorund performance is
disappointing.
/max
AFAIR, the DDL generation fails on my test suite for this DB. They are
too strict in some are. So unless they've relaxed s
AFAIR, the DDL generation fails on my test suite for this DB. They are
too strict in some are. So unless they've relaxed some restriction, it's
a nope for me.
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Hi,
A small FYI crosspost here since both communities has talked about it.
Tonight I tried out Derby and
#1 - cool, just let me know when you are done.
#2 - is not bubbled up to Query yet. I need to finish some other
refactoring regarding how queries are parsed/cached first. Just follow
HHH-844 and its related cases for the status. Yes, there are
"type-less" setParameter() methods on Query.
There maybe some setting we are just missing for test purposes. For
example, I don't know about you, but on my Oracle setup I disable
recovery logging on the datafiles backing my test schema. Without
disabling this option, it is painfully slow to run the testsuite against
Oracle; and obviously I
Hi,
The "JVM wide system property derby.system.durability to the value true"
does just that (recommended by the Derby crowd).
And it has an effect, but surely not enough; my oracle installation runs
faster.
/max
There maybe some setting we are just missing for test purposes. For
example
Title: [Hibernate] 3.1 rc2
Great
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
en nombre de Steve EbersoleEnviado el: vie 14/10/2005
16:41Para: Hibernate developmentAsunto: [Hibernate] 3.1
rc2
So as far as I am concerned, I am ready to push out
3.1rc2. Anythinganyone else wanted to get into this before I cut
