Protocol Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : Host Identity Protocol Architecture
Authors : Robert Moskowitz
Miika Komu
Filename: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-09.txt
Pages : 39
Date: 2014-10
Hi Tom,
On 07/29/2014 01:09 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
For RFC5202bis, the main issue is the recommendation of NULL encryption
as a MUST to implement (issue 43). This has been discussed on the saag
list and on this list, and I don't think it is yet resolved although I
would like to again
Hi,
On 07/29/2014 01:14 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
This issue with RFC5201-bis is being tracked as issue 48:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/48
When a HIP association is in state CLOSING and new data arrives to send
to the peer, Table 7 states to send another I1 but stay in
Hi,
On 07/22/2014 01:50 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
Also - there are no counter modes, is that wise?
HIP DEX defines AES-128-CTR for HIP_CIPHER [3]. However, I just
realized that it does not specify its use for the ENCRYPTED
parameter. Instead, the specification focuses on the special-purpose
Hi,
On 07/08/2014 07:54 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies for cross-posting, but Stephen Farrell raised a DISCUSS
(seconded by Kathleen Moriarty) in the IESG evaluation of RFC 5202-bis:
Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport Format with
the Host Identity Protocol
Hi,
On 06/30/2014 08:46 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
3) Section 5.2.18: given the strict ordering of HIP parameters, the
initial
plaintext for the Encrypted content (type and length of initial
parameter) may be fairly easily guessed. This opens up the minor
possibility of a known plaintext attack.
Hi,
On 07/02/2014 05:26 PM, Miika Komu wrote:
Hi,
On 06/30/2014 08:46 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
3) Section 5.2.18: given the strict ordering of HIP parameters, the
initial
plaintext for the Encrypted content (type and length of initial
parameter) may be fairly easily guessed. This opens up
Hi,
On 05/19/2014 09:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a real need to provide ESP tunnel mode from a HIP client to a
gateway. The world just won't go as nicely as I would have wanted it to.
location-based security is old fashioned :(
At the application layer, tunnel mode may have some
Hi,
On 05/02/2014 01:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 04/30/2014 02:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Automotive analogy because right now I have been dragged back to my
automotive history to work on the Connected Car security...
I am working on multiple HIP projects. Real vendors with real
FYI,
HIP for Linux is now utilized in a testbed cloud deployment that is
used for analyzing CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid) data
from CERN. The HIP protocol provides secure connectivity and connection
management capabilities for the OpenStack based cloud.
Thanks to Salman Toor, Juhani Toivonen and
Hi,
sure thing, thanks Tom for comments!
On 04/08/2014 01:25 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi Tom,
thanks for your comments. Authors, could you please look into this?
Thanks,
Gonzalo
On 07/04/2014 12:08 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
Hi,
we WGLCed this draft some time ago, but we are
Hi,
I have fixed some typos in the latest version of architecture draft
(draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-07). I'd suggest to move it to last call
unless there are more quick comments.
___
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
FYI,
On 09/26/2013 11:45 PM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
I'll try to wrap up the inputs and post a revision over the weekend, if no
further comments. Please see inline below.
Xin Gu implemented HIPv2 (sponsored by Aalto university) and the code is
now available in the HIPL trunk:
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 10:05 PM, Sasu Tarkoma wrote:
Hi all,
I read the latest HIP architecture draft (4423bis-05) and it looks
very good. Below you will find some observations that I made
when reading the draft.
looks good to me too but I have also some suggestions for improvement.
Here's the
Hi,
On 10/17/2012 06:36 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
5.1. HIP Control Packets:
The HIP header and parameters follow the conventions of [RFC5201]
with the exception that the HIP header checksum MUST be zero.
Authors, can we get rid of the pseudo header or are we stuck with
it? Or can we
Hi,
On 09/13/2012 11:11 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Folks,
I would like to start the WGLCs on the following two drafts. These WGLCs
will end on September 30th.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/
In
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
