I find the same as Caroline Miller, about 20-25% with formalin fixation and
routine processing.
C
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Caroline Miller via Histonet <
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
> hi All, I have done some experiments in this area for mouse brains, and I
> find that
Has anyone been able to optimize an antibody to BCL-10 using Ventana's
Ultraview detection?
Angie
IMPORTANT WARNING: The information in this message (and the documents attached
to it, if any) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended
solely for the addressee. Access to
hi All, I have done some experiments in this area for mouse brains, and I
find that there is actually an expansion of tissue after formalin fixation
(around 10%), but then certainly a shrinkage to 100% dehydration agent of
about 20% from the original size. We found similar results with alcohol,
LOL...Shrinkage...heh, heh.
But seriously, there should be little to no gross shrinkage from formalin
fixation and if the specimen is properly fixed, then there should be very
little gross shrinkage as it is dehydrated. That is supposed to be the point!
If someone is getting 30% shrinkage,
My question refers to the difference in dimensions of the native tissue and the
fixed tissue. – so without any influence of ethanol and xylol.
I have no access to the whole publication you mentioned. If I understand the
summary correctly, 2,5% shrinkage was found after formalinfixation.
I think fixing with Davidson is ethanol-fixation in the first line. There
are some antigens, that are susceptible to ethanol.
Gudrun
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Judi Ford via Histonet [mailto:histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Februar 2016 18:45
An:
Today I learned what Davidson's fixative is! Thanks!
Anyway, so it's a strong alcoholic formalin. The answer to your question
is; yes. You need to be careful of overfixation, thus masking the epitope
in question.
From Dako:
" Of the many pre-analytical variables which affect IHC and ISH
Agree with you Jay Lundgren.
Michael Ann Jones, HT (ASCP)
Histology Manager
Metropath
7444 W. Alaska Dr. #250
Lakewood, CO 80226
303.634.2511
mjo...@metropath.com
On 2/22/16, 12:30 PM, "Jay Lundgren via Histonet"
wrote:
>I was taught at AFIP to expect
I was taught at AFIP to expect shrinkage of 10%, in each dimension. So I
guess that's 30% shrinkage overall? Shrinkage is partially caused by
formalin crosslinking the proteins in fixation, and partially by
dehydration. Maybe a little shrinkage in xylene too? From removal of fat
in adipose
Hi Everyone. Hope you all had a really good weekend. Thanks for the replies to
my double ihc question.
I do have another question; this one is from a friend of mine. Her client wants
to do ihc on rabbit eye tissue. The tissue will be fixed in Davidson's fixative
for 24 hours then in 10% NBF.
Hi!
Today someone asked me about shrinkage caused by the fixation with
formaldehyde specially on skin-biopsies. She spoke about shrinkage of 30%
percent. In my opinion shrinkage is mainly caused by the processing with
dehydration and defatting. Formaldehyde renders the tissue harder but not
Spring is just around the corner and GSH cordially invites you to our annual
meeting at the Lanier Islands resort. The Lakefront Lodge is 12 miles from the
Mall of Georgia and offers many amenities, such as free wifi and heated outdoor
pool. There's no better way to earn your CE credits. It's
12 matches
Mail list logo