Re: [Histonet] Shrinkage
I find the same as Caroline Miller, about 20-25% with formalin fixation and routine processing. C On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Caroline Miller via Histonet < histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote: > hi All, I have done some experiments in this area for mouse brains, and I > find that there is actually an expansion of tissue after formalin fixation > (around 10%), but then certainly a shrinkage to 100% dehydration agent of > about 20% from the original size. We found similar results with alcohol, > acetone and THF. > > This is manual fluid changes or a day per solution, with no vacuum, temp or > pressure. > > Happy to share the data if anyone is interested > > yours, > mills > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Terri Braud via Histonet < > histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote: > > > LOL...Shrinkage...heh, heh. > > But seriously, there should be little to no gross shrinkage from formalin > > fixation and if the specimen is properly fixed, then there should be very > > little gross shrinkage as it is dehydrated. That is supposed to be the > > point! If someone is getting 30% shrinkage, there is something seriously > > wrong with their processing schedule. > > Sincerely, Terri > > Terri L. Braud, HT(ASCP) > > Anatomic Pathology Supervisor > > > > Today's Topics: > >2. formalin and shrinkage (Gudrun Lang) > > > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:59:21 +0100 > > From: "Gudrun Lang"> > Subject: [Histonet] formalin and shrinkage > > Hi! > > Today someone asked me about shrinkage caused by the fixation with > > formaldehyde specially on skin-biopsies. She spoke about shrinkage of > 30% > > percent. In my opinion shrinkage is mainly caused by the processing with > > dehydration and defatting. Formaldehyde renders the tissue harder but not > > strictly smaller. > > What is the opinion of the community? > > Gudrun > > > > > > > > ___ > > Histonet mailing list > > Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu > > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet > > > > > > -- > Caroline Miller (mills) > Director of Histology > 3Scan.com > 415 2187297 > ___ > Histonet mailing list > Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet > ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] Shrinkage
hi All, I have done some experiments in this area for mouse brains, and I find that there is actually an expansion of tissue after formalin fixation (around 10%), but then certainly a shrinkage to 100% dehydration agent of about 20% from the original size. We found similar results with alcohol, acetone and THF. This is manual fluid changes or a day per solution, with no vacuum, temp or pressure. Happy to share the data if anyone is interested yours, mills On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Terri Braud via Histonet < histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote: > LOL...Shrinkage...heh, heh. > But seriously, there should be little to no gross shrinkage from formalin > fixation and if the specimen is properly fixed, then there should be very > little gross shrinkage as it is dehydrated. That is supposed to be the > point! If someone is getting 30% shrinkage, there is something seriously > wrong with their processing schedule. > Sincerely, Terri > Terri L. Braud, HT(ASCP) > Anatomic Pathology Supervisor > > Today's Topics: >2. formalin and shrinkage (Gudrun Lang) > > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:59:21 +0100 > From: "Gudrun Lang"> Subject: [Histonet] formalin and shrinkage > Hi! > Today someone asked me about shrinkage caused by the fixation with > formaldehyde specially on skin-biopsies. She spoke about shrinkage of 30% > percent. In my opinion shrinkage is mainly caused by the processing with > dehydration and defatting. Formaldehyde renders the tissue harder but not > strictly smaller. > What is the opinion of the community? > Gudrun > > > > ___ > Histonet mailing list > Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet > -- Caroline Miller (mills) Director of Histology 3Scan.com 415 2187297 ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] Shrinkage
LOL...Shrinkage...heh, heh. But seriously, there should be little to no gross shrinkage from formalin fixation and if the specimen is properly fixed, then there should be very little gross shrinkage as it is dehydrated. That is supposed to be the point! If someone is getting 30% shrinkage, there is something seriously wrong with their processing schedule. Sincerely, Terri Terri L. Braud, HT(ASCP) Anatomic Pathology Supervisor Today's Topics: 2. formalin and shrinkage (Gudrun Lang) Message: 2 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:59:21 +0100 From: "Gudrun Lang"Subject: [Histonet] formalin and shrinkage Hi! Today someone asked me about shrinkage caused by the fixation with formaldehyde specially on skin-biopsies. She spoke about shrinkage of 30% percent. In my opinion shrinkage is mainly caused by the processing with dehydration and defatting. Formaldehyde renders the tissue harder but not strictly smaller. What is the opinion of the community? Gudrun ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] shrinkage during IHC
In my experience, IHC usually plumps tissue back up during reteival. Is this noticed with every antibody or just a few? Certain tissue types? -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of zodia...@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 8:28 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] shrinkage during IHC To All, We are a lab that sends our specimens out for IHC and have just switched to another reference laboratory for these services. Our pathologist is saying that the tissue looks shrunk on the IHC slides, yet the slides that I process (HE, and special stains)are fine. Does anyone know what is causing this? The reference lab said it could be the type of slides that I use to mount the sections we send to them. My knowledge in IHC is limited. Also, if this helps, they are FFPE tissue. Thanks for your help Jenny ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet The information in this e-mail, and any attachments therein, is confidential and for use by the intended addressee only. If this message is received by you in error please do not disseminate or read further. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete the message. Although Catholic Health Services of Long Island attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Thank you. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: SPAM-LOW: [Histonet] shrinkage during IHC
You should have the same morphology from the IHC slides done outside that you get from your HE, do you provide them with slides or the Block? The only thing I can think of is if they airdry after IHC instead of going thru alcohols and xylene to coverslip (if they use AEC or ap/red they may airdry), I have seen cell shrinkage from airdrying after IHC occasionally. Something else just occurred to me, if they over heat during HIER I suppose this could happen, but I have not seen it. Regards, Patsy Patsy Ruegg, HT(ASCP)QIHC IHCtech 12635 Montview Blvd. Ste.215 Aurora, CO 80045 720-859-4060 fax 720-859-4110 www.ihctech.net www.ihcrg.org -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of zodia...@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 6:28 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: SPAM-LOW: [Histonet] shrinkage during IHC To All, We are a lab that sends our specimens out for IHC and have just switched to another reference laboratory for these services. Our pathologist is saying that the tissue looks shrunk on the IHC slides, yet the slides that I process (HE, and special stains)are fine. Does anyone know what is causing this? The reference lab said it could be the type of slides that I use to mount the sections we send to them. My knowledge in IHC is limited. Also, if this helps, they are FFPE tissue. Thanks for your help Jenny ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] shrinkage during IHC
To All, We are a lab that sends our specimens out for IHC and have just switched to another reference laboratory for these services. Our pathologist is saying that the tissue looks shrunk on the IHC slides, yet the slides that I process (HE, and special stains)are fine. Does anyone know what is causing this? The reference lab said it could be the type of slides that I use to mount the sections we send to them. My knowledge in IHC is limited. Also, if this helps, they are FFPE tissue. Thanks for your help Jenny ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] shrinkage
I seem to remember a good discussion in this in the following book:. L. P. Kok and M. E. Boon. *Microwave Cookbook for Microscopists*, Coulomb Press Leyden, Leiden (1992) p. 1–432 . Whetehr or not it is still available is another matter On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Edwards, Richard E. r...@leicester.ac.ukwrote: Anybody aware of the degree of shrinkage in paraffin processed tissues and/or GMA processed tissues?, many thanks. Cheers Richard Edwards Leicester University. Leicester U.K. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet -- Louise Renton Bone Research Unit University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa +27 11 717 2298 (tel fax) 073 5574456 (emergencies only) There are nights when the wolves are silent and only the moon howls. George Carlin No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] shrinkage/a howlong is a piece of string type question
Many thanks to all who responded, for paraffin processed tissues the figures suggested for the amount of shrinkage found or expected were :- more than 5%:5-10%:10%(twice):10-15%:20%:25%:30-35%:30-40%, one responder felt it was noticeable and another thought it was a fairy tale concocted by pathologistsunsurprisingly many responders thought that the degree of shrinkage was dependent on the fixative used, processing schedule and the nature of the tissue itself, e.g. amount of lipid present. As far as shrinkage with GMA processed tissue go, a single response of 5% was quoted. Richard Edwards ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: Testing for shrinkage RE: [Histonet] shrinkage/a howlong is a piece of string type question
Hey lady, How are you? I haven't seen you on Histonet much lately. I hope that means that you are doing fun things and not working so hard. We have settled in Plano. It's so nice to be around family! Will I see you at NSH? If so, we have to have our night out again so we can catch up on gossip... Kind regards, Jan Minshew Marketing Manager Leica Microsystems Biosystems Division 2345 Waukegan Road Bannockburn, IL 60015 Office: 847.405.7051 Cell: 847.970.8468 Fax: 847.405.6560 www.leica-microsystems.com Click Here for this month's special offers! [1]http://www.leica-microsystems.com/bsdspecial gayle callis gayle.cal...@bresnan.net Sent by: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 08/25/2010 10:59 AM To 'Edwards, Richard E.' r...@leicester.ac.uk, histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu cc Subject Testing for shrinkage RE: [Histonet] shrinkage/a howlong is a piece of string type question Have you ever thought of doing a shrinkage test? Take a tissue specimen, and xerox or use a flat bed scanner. Put fixed sample between plastic sheets, and scan it as unfixed tissue, fixed before processing and then after processing while in a faced paraffin block. Take all the measurements and then do the calculations./We used to xerox large stained bone sections, a clever way of getting a precise macro-images of a huge specimen to show gross features of a defect. This did a better job than trying to do a macro-photo with a camera or through a microscope (the latter doesn't happen). Years ago, when preparing for HTL exam practical, the samples e.g. tissue sections submitted had to be within a certain size range, and it was duly noted that after processing, the samples had shrinkage. This required going back to fixed tissue and cutting a bigger piece to compensate for the shrinkage and have a final correct sample/section size to follow the practical rules. As for GMA, there is a special processing schedule given to me that does not use alcohol dehydration (for lipid staining work). This protocol uses an GMA/watergradient since GMA is miscible with water. I would think there would be even less shrinkage with a water/GMA gradient and the source of shrinkage would come from the heat of polymerization and possibly a bit from kind of fixative used. The heat can controlled to some degree by doing polymerization on ice, or in a refrigerator, with the round JB4 metal chucks to dissipate the heat. Once again, I agree with Bryan Hewlett's assessment of shrinkage. Gayle Callis HTL/HT/MT(ASCP) Bozeman MT -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]On Behalf Of Edwards, Richard E. Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:50 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] shrinkage/a howlong is a piece of string type question Many thanks to all who responded, for paraffin processed tissues the figures suggested for the amount of shrinkage found or expected were :- more than 5%:5-10%:10%(twice):10-15%:20%:25%:30-35%:30-40%, one responder felt it was noticeable and another thought it was a fairy tale concocted by pathologistsunsurprisingly many responders thought that the degree of shrinkage was dependent on the fixative used, processing schedule and the nature of the tissue itself, e.g. amount of lipid present. As far as shrinkage with GMA processed tissue go, a single response of 5% was quoted. Richard Edwards ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5394 (20100824) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5394 (20100824) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5396 (20100825) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database
[Histonet] shrinkage
Anybody aware of the degree of shrinkage in paraffin processed tissues and/or GMA processed tissues?, many thanks. Cheers Richard Edwards Leicester University. Leicester U.K. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] shrinkage
Shrinkage for paraffin processed tissues is about 20%. For GMA it is less than 5% which is one reason GMA stuff looks so nice. Geoff Edwards, Richard E. wrote: Anybody aware of the degree of shrinkage in paraffin processed tissues and/or GMA processed tissues?, many thanks. Cheers Richard Edwards Leicester University. Leicester U.K. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet -- -- ** Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D. Neuroscience and Cell Biology Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 voice: (732)-235-4583 mcaul...@umdnj.edu ** ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
AW: [Histonet] shrinkage
I think tissue shrinkage is a fairy tail, told by pathologists at the grossing. ;) Sure, it is a little bit large, but it will shrink.. Too big blocks stay too big while embedding. **just for smiling** There's a study by Cecil Fox 1985 (Formaldehyde fixation), who showed that shrinkage while fixation occurs only with concentrated formaldehyd, perhaps due to the methanol-part in commercial formalin. For dehydration, de-fattation and infiltration I think, it depends on the gradationsteps of the solutions, the applied temperature and the ingredients of the tissue. With our standard protocol (13 hours VIP) I never found excessiv shrinkage. So, like always, it depends... Gudrun Lang -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] Im Auftrag von Tench, Bill Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. August 2010 17:33 An: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Betreff: [Histonet] shrinkage I have never seen a study, but when training, we were taught that fixation and processing could result in up to 5-10% shrinkage. Bill Tench Associate Dir. Laboratory Services Chief, Cytology Services Palomar Medical Center 555 E. Valley Parkway Escondido, California 92025 bill.te...@pph.org Voice: 760- 739-3037 Fax: 760-739-2604 [None] made the following annotations - Confidential E-Mail: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and destroy the original message and all copies. - ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] shrinkage
When I wrote my thesis on sweat glands, my experience was that fixation in Helly's fluid (Zenker-formol) and paraffin embedding caused serious shrinkage: about 10-15% in each dimension. Allen A. Smith Professor of Anatomy Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Gudrun Lang Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:50 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: AW: [Histonet] shrinkage I think tissue shrinkage is a fairy tail, told by pathologists at the grossing. ;) Sure, it is a little bit large, but it will shrink.. Too big blocks stay too big while embedding. **just for smiling** There's a study by Cecil Fox 1985 (Formaldehyde fixation), who showed that shrinkage while fixation occurs only with concentrated formaldehyd, perhaps due to the methanol-part in commercial formalin. For dehydration, de-fattation and infiltration I think, it depends on the gradationsteps of the solutions, the applied temperature and the ingredients of the tissue. With our standard protocol (13 hours VIP) I never found excessiv shrinkage. So, like always, it depends... Gudrun Lang -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] Im Auftrag von Tench, Bill Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. August 2010 17:33 An: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Betreff: [Histonet] shrinkage I have never seen a study, but when training, we were taught that fixation and processing could result in up to 5-10% shrinkage. Bill Tench Associate Dir. Laboratory Services Chief, Cytology Services Palomar Medical Center 555 E. Valley Parkway Escondido, California 92025 bill.te...@pph.org Voice: 760- 739-3037 Fax: 760-739-2604 [None] made the following annotations - Confidential E-Mail: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and destroy the original message and all copies. - ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet