Hi,
Thank
you for the clarification and sorry for the misunderstood.
hapi
version I use is
very old.
Is it safe and easy to migrate
to version 2.1?
Thank
you for your help.
Sorry,
I
forgot to tell you the version of HAPI that I use.
This is the 0.5.1
Bests regards
Hi James..
Any update? would like to know the conclusion..
Thanks & regards
On 17 September 2013 22:11, vijayaratha vijayasingam
wrote:
> Hi James,
> Any update on this MSH9 filed from InM team?
>
> Thanks
> -Ratha
>
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 20:47, vijayaratha vijayasingam wrote:
>
>> Thanks Eugen
Yes, it's definitely time for an update!
In general it's pretty safe to update as we are pretty reluctant with
backwards-incompatible changes. A couple of things have been deprecated and
finally removed, but the core of the API has not changed much since then.
One notable thing is that the HL7 ver
No, validation rules are additive. Particularly, message rules (e.g. with a
terser expression) do not override primitive rules, they further restrict
the content of a specific field within the bounds of the rules of its
(primitive) type!
I would be reluctant to change the default primitive rules,
Thanks Christian,
That explanation gels with the way that I'm coming to think of this. Many
thanks for all of your help.
Andrew
From: Christian Ohr [mailto:christian@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 26 September 2013 4:26 AM
To: Andrew Bowden
Cc: hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [
6 matches
Mail list logo
