Re: [hlcoders] Problems with STL and min/max of Source Engine

I did a quick benchmark on linux with gcc 4.9.1/clang 3.4.2, and it looks like std::vector is actually faster than CUtlVector when inserting 10 elements: CUtlVector: 9021 µs std::vector: 4456 µs It's faster as well when removing the first 1000: CUtlVector: 88 µs std::vector: 39 µs It may have

Re: [hlcoders] Problems with STL and min/max of Source Engine

Not bad. I was thinking about the Microsoft STL implementation when I wrote that but still good to know. El jul 27, 2014 1:12 PM, AnAkIn anakin...@gmail.com escribió: I did a quick benchmark on linux with gcc 4.9.1/clang 3.4.2, and it looks like std::vector is actually faster than CUtlVector