Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on

2019-01-15 Thread Alexander Cox
, 16 January 2019 at 16:36 To: Konrad Slind Cc: hol-info Subject: Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on Hi Konrad and Chun, When I change the goal to ∀A Γ. Gm Γ A ⇒ ∀Γ'. Gm Γ' A, I still get errors with both Induct_on and HO_MATCH_MP_TAC (“not registered in the types database

Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on

2019-01-15 Thread Michael.Norrish
. Michael From: Alexander Cox Date: Wednesday, 16 January 2019 at 16:36 To: Konrad Slind Cc: hol-info Subject: Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on Hi Konrad and Chun, When I change the goal to ∀A Γ. Gm Γ A ⇒ ∀Γ'. Gm Γ' A, I still get errors with both Induct_on and HO_MATCH_MP_TAC

Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on

2019-01-15 Thread Alexander Cox
Hi Konrad and Chun, When I change the goal to ∀A Γ. Gm Γ A ⇒ ∀Γ'. Gm Γ' A, I still get errors with both Induct_on and HO_MATCH_MP_TAC (“not registered in the types database”, “at HolKernel.ho_match_term: at ??.failwith: term_pmatch” respectively). It appears (to me) that Gm_ind wants Γ and A

Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on

2019-01-15 Thread Konrad Slind
I suspect that the order of quantification in the goal is important, since that controls how the induction predicate is instantiated. So try !Gamma A. Gm Gamma A ==> !Gamma'. since that makes it explicit for the machinery. Konrad. On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:30 AM Chun Tian (binghe)

Re: [Hol-info] Confused about Induct_on

2019-01-14 Thread Chun Tian (binghe)
Hi, I think you should use HO_MATCH_MP_TAC (together with your induction theorem of “Gm”, of the form ``!Gm. X ==> P Gm``) in this case. I only use Induct and Induct_on on simple variables like your Γ Γ’ A. —Chun > Il giorno 15 gen 2019, alle ore 14:49, Alexander Cox ha > scritto: > > I