Re: [homenet] draft-ietf-homenet-arch-04

2012-10-01 Thread RJ Atkinson
On 01 Oct 2012, at 15:01 , Curtis Villamizar wrote: You are suggesting if A then !B. No, my apologies for being unclear. I am NOT, repeat NOT, suggesting that. (A !B) is a possible deployment option, of course, but it is not the ONLY option either. I prefer if A and B, then C. I

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-haddad-homenet-multihomed-00

2012-10-01 Thread Damien Saucez
On 01 Oct 2012, at 14:33, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/10/2012 08:32, Damien Saucez wrote: Curtis, Thank you for the comments. Our target in this document is to raise the question of multihoming in personal and/or small/medium enterprise networks, so for

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-haddad-homenet-multihomed-00

2012-10-01 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Curtis Damien, On 01/10/2012 19:01, Curtis Villamizar wrote: In message 50698d7f.5000...@gmail.com Brian E Carpenter writes: On 01/10/2012 08:32, Damien Saucez wrote: Curtis, Thank you for the comments. Our target in this document is to raise the question of multihoming in personal

Re: [homenet] draft-ietf-homenet-arch-04

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew McGregor
In fact, my connection in NZ gives me a /48 via DHCPv6 PD, although some providers I gather are doing /56. Andrew On 2/10/2012, at 10:41 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tracking this conversation for a while, excuse the top post. 0) The state of cable modems is rather