I have read the draft and don't see how it advances Homenet.
IMHO If an MSP wants to deploy some tunnel brokers on the Internet to
terminate what boils down to a pair of GRE tunnels, they can do so
without the IETF providing any new standards work, and it'll all work
just fine.
I'd prefer
What about taking section 5 (summary) of RFC 6177 as a guide and apply it to
our specific case? I don't think we would conflict with any of the statements,
but we could provide a bit more justification and direction than what is there
for the homenet specifically. For example, the operational
In message 506c889b.4070...@centurylink.net
Jeff Bowden writes:
Curtis,
I agree with your addition of that paragraph with the one exception of
removing the at no additional cost phrase. I agree it should be that
way but it is up to the individual ISP and not the IETF as to what
