Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with COMMENT)

On 20 Nov 2015, at 1:30, Markus Stenberg wrote: On 18.11.2015, at 17.02, Steven Barth wrote: -6.4, first paragraph: "Each HNCP node SHOULD announce an IPv6 address and - if it supports IPv4 - MUST announce an IPv4 address," I don't suppose there's any way we can make IPv6

Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with COMMENT)

> I am not fine with SHOULD for IPv4 as it will essentially break it; Agreed, but I don't feel strongly about it. > I can live with MUST for IPv6 but consider it unneccessary. Agreed, announcing your IPv6 address, if it's chosen randomly, just wastes 24 bytes * prefixes * nodes * interfaces.

Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with COMMENT)

Hello Ben, thanks for the review. > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > Minor Issues: > === > > -4, 1st paragraph, last sentence: > I confused by the fact this

Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with COMMENT)

Thanks! A couple of remaining comments below. I removed sections that don't seem to need further discussion. Ben. On 18 Nov 2015, at 9:02, Steven Barth wrote: [...] -6.4, first paragraph: "Each HNCP node SHOULD announce an IPv6 address and - if it supports IPv4 - MUST announce an IPv4

[homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to