Sounds good to me. Anyone objecting DIstribution Manager ? If not I will
consider this terminology.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:11 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> Daniel Migault wrote:
> > "Distribution Primary" is probably my preferred alternative as the
> > replacement
Daniel Migault wrote:
> "Distribution Primary" is probably my preferred alternative as the
> replacement of Master by Primary makes a smooth transition from what is
> currently used. If that is fine with everyone I will update the
> document with it as well as the DHCP option
"Distribution Primary" is probably my preferred alternative as the
replacement of Master by Primary makes a smooth transition from what is
currently used. If that is fine with everyone I will update the document
with it as well as the DHCP option draft. If not feel free to provide a
better
On 6. May 2021, at 00:06, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Ole Troan wrote:
>> Is this the same as a hidden primary name server?
>
> That's Stealth Primary.
> The DM is not a stealth primary, because it's not primary.
> It hasn't got the DNSSEC signing keys, for instance.
Distribution hub
Ole Troan wrote:
> Is this the same as a hidden primary name server?
That's Stealth Primary.
The DM is not a stealth primary, because it's not primary.
It hasn't got the DNSSEC signing keys, for instance.
>> On 5 May 2021, at 21:09, Michael Richardson
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ted
Or “Distribution Primary?” I think given this chart that “Distribution
Authority” is less clear, since the real authority is the stealth primary.
> On May 5, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On May 5, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Richardson
>> wrote:
>>>
Is this the same as a hidden primary name server?
Cheers
Ole
> On 5 May 2021, at 21:09, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Ted Lemon wrote:
>>> On May 5, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Richardson
>>> wrote:
>>> 3) We would be happy to go with another term, but we don't want to
>>> invent another
Ted Lemon wrote:
> On May 5, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Richardson
> wrote:
>> 3) We would be happy to go with another term, but we don't want to
>> invent another term. So, if the DNS anycast operator has another
>> term, then I'd go with it.
> Authority database?
I
On May 5, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 3) We would be happy to go with another term, but we don't want to invent
> another term. So, if the DNS anycast operator has another term, then
> I'd go with it.
Authority database?
RFC 8499 appears to have deprecated the term
STARK, BARBARA H wrote:
> I'm hoping not to start divisive discussion, but think it's better to
> discuss inside the WG rather than wait until IETF LC.
> Might the authors consider whether a word other than "Master" could be
> used in the terms Distribution Master, Reverse
I'm hoping not to start divisive discussion, but think it's better to discuss
inside the WG rather than wait until IETF LC.
Might the authors consider whether a word other than "Master" could be used in
the terms Distribution Master, Reverse Distribution Master,
Distribution/Distributed Master
11 matches
Mail list logo
