On 21 Oct 2011, at 19:49, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
What people are arguing is a violation of the end-to-end principle is
having a provider put in place filters that can't be shut of by the
consumer.
chair hat=on
Anything outside of the home network is outside of our scope.
/chair
Ray
On 22 Oct 2011, at 01:18, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
Note the IETF IPv6 CE router specifies use of the ULA in the home to keep the
home network independent of the SP network. This way my computer at home can
still print to the printer even when my SP IPv6 network is down. We have said
On Oct 21, 2011, at 11:39 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
This is a response to Lee's list with Jim's additions.
Howard, Lee lee.how...@twcable.com wrote:
I've caught up on some 300 messages about routing. Here are the
requirements I've gleaned. Question marks are unclear to me, please
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Villamizar [mailto:cur...@occnc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 11:14 PM
To: Howard, Lee
Cc: Samita Chakrabarti; homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] routing requirements
In message
Trimmed, leaving only responses to the points Lee brought up.
In message 1dd9deae-0f85-41a1-b4c9-c8c09bc84...@twcable.com
Howard, Lee writes:
This almost covers one of Jim's points. Jim added unitentional join.
a. Convergence time a few minutes or less.
Seconds at least.
In message
dcc302faa9fe5f4bba4dcad4656937791451335...@prvpexvs03.corp.twcable.com
Howard, Lee writes:
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Villamizar [mailto:cur...@occnc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 11:14 PM
To: Howard, Lee
Cc: Samita Chakrabarti; homenet@ietf.org
In message CAD6AjGQG2p=v+0z3x6ab+ggw1bo2dizp6ztvik3b7uo-o95...@mail.gmail.com
Cameron Byrne writes:
On Oct 24, 2011 1:24 AM, Ray Bellis ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk wrote:
On 22 Oct 2011, at 01:18, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
Note the IETF IPv6 CE router specifies use of the ULA in
On Oct 24, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
Will those arguing for ND Proxy please stand up and be counted?
I have long complained that certain WPAN physical layers should be prepared to
attach to home networks, either by application layer gateways on bastion hosts,
or by dedicated ND/RD
In my v6 ops presentation in Beijing, Dave Thaler agreed with you (James).
I'm on the other side of the argument.
tom
From: james woodyatt j...@apple.com
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:33:26 -0700
To: Ray Bellis ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk
Cc: homenet@ietf.org Group homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
In message c5e8c3ca-ba31-4af7-abb2-729e8629b...@apple.com
james woodyatt writes:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
Will those arguing for ND Proxy please stand up and be counted?
I have long complained that certain WPAN physical layers should be
prepared to attach to
10 matches
Mail list logo
