Greetings HOT Community,
I have just opened the nomination period for new Voting Members (existing
Members should have received a separate email with instructions). If you
are committed to the HOT mission and desire a greater role on the
organizational side of things, I urge you to review our
Thanks Pierre.
Best,
On 1/21/15, Pierre GIRAUD pierre.gir...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the report.
For your information, this has already been reported.
https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/513
Regards,
Pierre
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Enock Seth Nyamador
I have difficulties with water I must confess. I'm mapping from a
satellite image taken an a particular day. All I see is water, not wadi
etc. If its a River I'm supposed to note which direction it flows. My
eyesight isn't that good. A wide river isn't a problem but when is a
Stream a River
I think water and waterways are some of the most difficult to map and
tag features there are, even when things are simple and clear in imagery.
To Ralph's points:
As to the tagging suggestion, Ralph, I _think_ the current best practice
is to tag an intermittent stream or river like this:
I would like to raise the issue of tags for *waterway=river*,
*waterway=stream* and* waterway=wadi.*
The problem that exists with the existing tags is that there is no visual
difference on the map for a stream (perennial) and a stream (intermittent)
and the only other option is wadi which gives a
I probably should have specified the thread is titled waterway=wadi
problem and this link is to the first (I think) message in the thread:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-January/020946.html
=Russ
___
HOT mailing list
Hi,
I'm no expert in the waterway arena, however I wanted to point out that
there is currently a pretty in-depth discussion of waterway tagging
(including some suggestions to discontinue using waterway=wadi) on the
Tagging mailing list, you can find the thread archive here:
Hi,
Seems changeset comments loaded via HOT taks into JOSM have spaces and
other symbols replaced by their percent-ending equivalent, as recorded
here[1]. I've ignored and entered correct comments several times.
Anyone also experiencing this? How did you fix it? Or am missing something.
1.
Hi All,
Really excited about this initiative. While I'm not able to join the call,
I hope to participate in future calls. In the meantime, I've been doing
some work on the Humanitarian UAV side, which may be of interest:
http://uaviators.org
http://uaviators.org/map
