[HPLIP-Devel] HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (HPLIP) 1.6.6a Release

2006-06-27 Thread Suffield, David
HPLIP 1.6.6a - This maintenance release has the following changes. 1. Added a check to hp-sendfax, hp-makecopies and hp-unload to disallow GUI mode if X is not available. 2. Changed the hpfax: retry to 10sec (from 30sec). 3. Changed device URI pattern matching in device.py for BEH compatability

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Anish Mistry
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 15:58, dwelch91 wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Suffield, David wrote: > >> Based on your feedback for a qt-less configuration. I think the > >> following configuration option can be added to a future HPLIP > >> release. > >> > >> --disab

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, dwelch91 wrote: > > However, if it would make your life easier to run the build twice with > > different configure options when one wants a non-gui mode, it should not be > > a problem for us either. > > Is this configure flag useful then? Not to Debian, and probably not for

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread dwelch91
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Suffield, David wrote: >> Based on your feedback for a qt-less configuration. I think the >> following configuration option can be added to a future HPLIP release. >> >> --disable-qt-build (default = no) >> >> This option would be used to bu

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Suffield, David wrote: > Based on your feedback for a qt-less configuration. I think the > following configuration option can be added to a future HPLIP release. > > --disable-qt-build (default = no) > > This option would be used to build a no-gui (command line only) HPLIP >

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Suffield, David
Based on your feedback for a qt-less configuration. I think the following configuration option can be added to a future HPLIP release. --disable-qt-build (default = no) This option would be used to build a no-gui (command line only) HPLIP configuration. With "qt-build=yes", no "qt-required" appli

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread dwelch91
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, dwelch91 wrote: >> Tim, I think for the purposes of a "Qt-less" HPLIP, you could create a >> RPM without: >> >> toolbox.py >> sendfax.py* >> fab.py* >> ui/ directory* >> plugins/ directory >> hpfax.py* >> HP-Fax-hplip.ppd* >> coverpages.py*

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, dwelch91 wrote: > Tim, I think for the purposes of a "Qt-less" HPLIP, you could create a > RPM without: > > toolbox.py > sendfax.py* > fab.py* > ui/ directory* > plugins/ directory > hpfax.py* > HP-Fax-hplip.ppd* > coverpages.py* The last time I tried this (it was the way I

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread dwelch91
One correction, hp-print would also be in this list. -Don dwelch91 wrote: > Tim, I think for the purposes of a "Qt-less" HPLIP, you could create a > RPM without: > > toolbox.py > sendfax.py* > fab.py* > ui/ directory* > plugins/ directory > hpfax.py* > HP-Fax-hplip.ppd* > coverpages.py* > > *

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread dwelch91
Tim, I think for the purposes of a "Qt-less" HPLIP, you could create a RPM without: toolbox.py sendfax.py* fab.py* ui/ directory* plugins/ directory hpfax.py* HP-Fax-hplip.ppd* coverpages.py* *Note: Except that I am working on a GUI-less version of faxing for the command line as it has been req

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Tim Waugh
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 11:56 +0200, Johannes Meixner wrote: > I assume what you really want is some kind of "base" package > which can actually be used and installed without any graphical > stuff (e.g. so that HPLIP can be used on a server without pulling > in tons of graphical stuff)? Yes, this i

Re: [HPLIP-Devel] Packaging qt-dependent HPLIP parts separately

2006-06-27 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hello, On Jun 26 17:52 Tim Waugh wrote (shortened): > When packaging HPLIP as RPMs I'd like to be able to separate out the > parts that require qt from those that don't. Is there an easy way to > distinguish the two sets of files I need? I assume what you really want is some kind of "base" pack