sn
>
> PGP: 8F72 C5BE AAFA B4BA 8F46 9185 5C39 89E0 616B B08C
> ___
> Hpr mailing list
> Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org<mailto:Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org>
> http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org<https://emea01.saf
The question raised by this blog post feel valid. I think the things to
consider are:
* How do we encourage increased quality without also excluding those for who
good audio quality is difficult to achieve?
A proposed answer: maybe we have volunteers to help "produce" shows, rather
than to
Hi,
As a short time listener (February of this year), who spent a month and a
half digging through the back catalog I have to say the show itself has
kept me constantly enthralled. Yes some of the audio could be better but
out of the 100+ shows I've listened to maybe 2 were totally unlistenable.
Just a quick note
I may be wrong ,but I thought the comments about the "quality of shows" had
more to do with those shows that felt more like they were put out just to put
something out. Those shows that are about 3 min long. (On a side note I have no
problem with those shows) I didn't think
Asked in isolation if the audio quality of any recording is important my answer
is a unequivocal "Yes". Asked in isolation if coherent and eloquent speech is
important my answer, again, is "Yes".
Despite this I feel there are circumstances where the message is more important
than the quality
The question raised by this blog post feel valid. I think the things to
consider are:
* How do we encourage increased quality without also excluding those for who
good audio quality is difficult to achieve?
A proposed answer: maybe we have volunteers to help "produce" shows, rather
than to
Hi nstr,
Since I follow you on Mastodon, I noticed the article when someone boosted
it and decided to give it a read. I also join in with the others in saying
that an apology is not necessary and I also believe you made some great
points.
Personally, I don't mind if the shows aren't polished as
Well, I'll offer my two cents since I feel as though I am going to somewhat
represent the voice of dissent.
I think the issues raised in the article are VERY valid, as are some of the
issues raised in these responses. I'm glad we have a space to hash through
them like the mailing list.
Going
Hi rtsn,
Speaking as a Janitor here for a moment.
As Klaatu pointed out quite rightly some years ago, our shows are
released under the Creative Commons license. There is nothing in that
license that requires any listener to submit a show. There are many ways
to contribute to HPR and many
Thank you for the apology. Now get out and fill an empty slot in the hpr
calendar
Brian-in-ohio
On 4/25/21 8:30 AM, Jason Dodd wrote:
Apology not necessary. In fact, I'd like to thank you for the post.
"I've considered this many times and attempted it a few but I'm
terrible at
Apology not necessary. In fact, I'd like to thank you for the post.
"I've considered this many times and attempted it a few but I'm
terrible at podcasting"
This is one of the reasons we don't have a minimum quality bar. I hope
you reconsider and put out a show. I read some of your
I had exactly the same feeling but was struggling with the wording. I
think you (both) said it spot on!
Op 25-04-2021 om 13:15 schreef Klaatu:
I don't think an apology is necessary. Your post generated healthy
introspection, and was itself both respectful and kind.
I think it's great
I don't think an apology is necessary. Your post generated healthy
introspection, and was itself both respectful and kind.
I think it's great that you're a listener and now, by way of constructive
criticism, you are also a contributor. Keep spreading the word!
On 25 April 2021 9:39:26 PM
On 21-04-24 20:02, BK Navarette wrote:
> Funny, why does the blog writer not do show? Give an example of quality. Or
> if they are shy use espeak or a volunteer to read i out, I'd be willing to
> help with either.
>
> Brian-in-ohio
>
Hello, I'm the author of the post.
I regret writing this
14 matches
Mail list logo
