CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Fred Toussi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Hsqldb-developers] JavaDoc Comments
> Except for the Locale code I infused into Trace, it should be very simple
to
> make a fat and slim distrubution. I
27;ll start with upgrading all of the jdbc class javadocs (except
DatabaseMetaData) tonight.
Cheers,
Campell
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Toussi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Hsqldb-developers]
sses you would like me to update with
better
> javadoc comments? As soon as I get the list, I will start.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Fred Toussi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:26 AM
> Subje
bell Boucher-Burnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "fredt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 9:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Hsqldb-developers] JavaDoc Comments
>
>
> > Fred:
> >
> > I think the JDBC
should take up the JDBC stuff,
anyway. Any volunteers?
Fred Toussi
- Original Message -
From: "Campbell Boucher-Burnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "fredt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 9:11 AM
Subject: Re
gs w.r.t.
user-level docs, I don't see why it should take us more than a couple of
days to get something quite acceptable out there.
- Original Message -
From: "fredt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Hsql
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 29 March 2002 02:57
Subject: Re: [Hsqldb-developers] JavaDoc Comments
Just let me know which files are laready taken, which have the highest
priority, and I'll spend some time each day on the one's I am assigend,
sending the resu
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:07 PM
Subject: [Hsqldb-developers] JavaDoc Comments
> There are a large number of warnings reported by ant javadoc for 1.7.0
RC3.
> Quite a lot of these are simply caused by missing descriptions to
parameter
> tags. Note that the sourc
There are a large number of warnings reported by ant javadoc for 1.7.0 RC3.
Quite a lot of these are simply caused by missing descriptions to parameter
tags. Note that the source has been through some automatic javadoc creation
reformatting, so some of the comments that look correct, are in fact
m
