[hugin-ptx] strangely calling antipano-sift-c

I found that even if I build hugin in x86 MSVC2008 and excute it in debug mode, it called antipano-sift-c.exe in c:\program files\hugin\bin, the one which was installed by hugin-0.7.0_win32-setup.exe. And I check my hugin SVN 3478, there is no antipano-sift-c excutable, but there is a antipan

[hugin-ptx] Re: New tutorial - stitching auto-exposed panoramas

> > This tutorial shows how to stitch such an 'unstitchable' > auto-exposed panorama using hugin-2009.2.0: > > http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/auto-exposure/ I'm using this technique a while (until now manually). It works great for handheld panorama with bright sky and dark landscape witho

[hugin-ptx] cleaning up the Hugin-Libpano link

Hello developers, I have not had any negative feedback about my patch to remove references to libpano12 from the Hugin code base. I will commit it before issuing the next tarball in the 2009.2.0 release cycle, which I intend to make a release candidate. I have two questions left about the Hug

[hugin-ptx] Re: Mailing List(s)

Hi Pablo, Pablo d'Angelo wrote: > Indeed. A reply to the bug tracker notification should end up as a > comment on the bug tracker, instead! Most people might be happy with the > additional complication of using a web-only forums (signing in, > navigating back to the bug etc, scrolling down, re

[hugin-ptx] Re: Error while creating panorama

Hallo Uwe, Uwe Koch Kronberg wrote: > enblend: warning: failed to detect any seam > enblend: mask is entirely black, but white image was not identified as > redundant > make: *** [panorama2.tif] Error 1 > > May I kindly ask someone for assistance, please? http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ#En

[hugin-ptx] Re: Updated extended enfuse and enblend documentation

texi2html was moaning about lines that contain @tie @tie{}C maybe it is something to do with that ? mick --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of fr

[hugin-ptx] Re: Updated extended enfuse and enblend documentation

2009/9/8 Erik Krause : > Could someone with texi2html installed try to convert one of the manuals > to mediawiki text and see how it displays in the panotools wiki? Or mail > me the result off list that I can try? I converted enblend.texi to html ok with texi2html then the perl thingy HTML::Wiki

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend/Enfuse 4.0 dev snapshots

Hi Chris, > First of all CPU load is a silly > measure.[...] For > a user only wall-clock time matters. > sure. I did not yet take times, but the new version is definitely faster than the old one. Of course 3 busy-waiting cpus and only one doing something useful will stress a 4-core

[hugin-ptx] Re: Updated extended enfuse and enblend documentation

cspiel wrote: > Furthermore, Texinfo is a powerful format, it > comes with fast translators to a variety of > output formats, and the sources are plain ASCII. > FYI, I would fight extremely hard against a > documentation format change. > > To address the "collaboration" question: Anyone > can wo

[hugin-ptx] [Press] LWN The Grumpy Editor's hugin experience

Hello, FYI lwn.net has posted a hugin review as part of the grumpy editor's series on . It is subscriber content only currently but will be freely accessible after a week. The editor wasn't very grumpy though, the article ends with "It definitely belongs on any L

[hugin-ptx] Re: Updated extended enfuse and enblend documentation

Erik - On Sep 8, 2:04 pm, Erik Krause wrote: > If I understand correctly, the documentation is not yet for the upcoming > version 4.0, is it? My approach to the release process is to always have a revision that passes make distcheck and my own test suite. Dunno whether this com

[hugin-ptx] Re: Mailing List(s)

Actually I like it the way how it's set up now. I think I can feel users needs and problems better when both development and user mailing lists are connected together. I like the immediate interaction between users and developers. I think I'd like it from ordinary user's point of view – this way I

[hugin-ptx] Re: Updated extended enfuse and enblend documentation

cspiel wrote: > Thank you very much for making the new > documentation of Enblend and Enfuse available > online! Yes, many thanks! If I understand correctly, the documentation is not yet for the upcoming version 4.0, is it? However, how shall we proceed with the wiki pages at http://wiki.pan

[hugin-ptx] Re: Mailing List(s)

Pablo d'Angelo wrote: > I would of course subscribe to -dev, and read it. I suspect that most > developers are probably happy with the current situation. Taking the low > level dev talk of the main list will probably mostly affect the users on > the main list. My opinion, too. I think it is t

[hugin-ptx] Re: how to add another parameter to the optimization?

Cool, are you planning any test-release of that? Cheers /O 2009/9/8 D M German > > > hi Everybody, > > i am trying to finish and integrate the tilt function that Dev > implemented during the summer. > > I have everything working except the optimization. I just can't understand > the optimizer v

[hugin-ptx] Re: Mailing List(s)

As a user with a little coding background I don't mind the dev talk. In fact I find it interesting (at least, when I am able to understand it) On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Pablo d'Angelo wrote: > > Hi Yuv, > Yuval Levy wrote: > > James Legg wrote: > >> hugin-ptx is the only list linked to on

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend/Enfuse 4.0 dev snapshots

On Sep 8, 12:49 am, Benjamin Schnieders wrote: > Inspecting the enblend run with top I see that indeed enblend sometimes > uses more than 100% cpu - but never more than like 200%, usually it is > around 100% and from time to time there is a peak using somewhat more. First of all CPU load