(with apols to anyone who reads panotools or rec.photo.digital)
Interesting question from rec.photo.digital.
A guy wants to take a series of shots of
the label of a paint can, then stitch them
together.
His target is the equivalent of what he'd get
if he simple removed the label, laid it flat,
I recently loaded the latest Hugin for Mac (2010.2.0) onto my G4 Mac
running OSX Leopard. When I try to load images I get the message
Illegal characters =%; in the filename. The images I am trying to
load are jpg files and don't have any of these characters in the
filenames. What am I doing
Hi,
2010/10/25 mbrubaker mbrubake...@gmail.com
I recently loaded the latest Hugin for Mac (2010.2.0) onto my G4 Mac
running OSX Leopard. When I try to load images I get the message
Illegal characters =%; in the filename. The images I am trying to
load are jpg files and don't have any of
mbrubaker schrieb am 25.10.10 17:22:
I recently loaded the latest Hugin for Mac (2010.2.0) onto my G4 Mac
running OSX Leopard. When I try to load images I get the message
Illegal characters =%; in the filename. The images I am trying to
load are jpg files and don't have any of these characters
On 24 October 2010 18:46, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
One more experiment.
I tried creating remapped images in two ways:
* Exposure corrected, low dynamic range: the -2 exposure was much too
light, the +2 exposure was too dark.
This is expected as the exposure optimization
On Oct 22, 9:13 pm, Henk Tijdink h.tijd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All
Probably no patent issues because it is french webspace, because the
EU has other rules then the USA.
If someone can confirm that in UE the SIFT patent isn't applicable I
can put the binary on my webspace ( in Italy)
When I did research on copyright laws, (in reference to japanese
animation and fansubs) I located some international agreements that
would prohibit fansubs in the US even though copyright had not been
applied for, as they had been copyrighted in their own country.
Essentially fansubs are not legal
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:10:41 +0200, Felix Hagemann wrote:
On 24 October 2010 18:46, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
* No exposure correction, low dynamic range: everything was good.
If I then enfused matching images with no exposure correction, I got
good results. Unfortunately,
I'm having trouble figuring out exactly what the enfuse options
--exposure-mu and --exposure-sigma actually do.
I've posted very small versions of all the shots on
http://rlk.smugmug.com/Photography/enfuse-test.
I'm trying to fuse
* 0EV:
