On Nov 23, 11:50 pm, "michael crane" wrote:
> ... Yuv...
> It is one of those mysteries. I do not know what your motivation is. for 5
> years or so I have seen you pontificating as project self appointed leader
> and I do not know what has been successful. Please do a feature freeze.
> take a back
Hullo Yuval,
On Nov 24, 2:33 pm, Yuval Levy wrote:
>
> yes, it should have been ptbatcher (no gui). Fix is on the way to the
> repository in a few moments.
OK, I've tested that revision, but it doesn't fix the problem with my
current build spec.
Before the change to the visuals, ptbatchergui
On Nov 23, 2010, at 4:50 PM, "michael crane" wrote:
>
> On Tue, November 23, 2010 5:23 am, Yuval Levy wrote:
>> On November 22, 2010 06:17:38 pm michael crane wrote:
>>> as I understand things you are not such a hot coder so why are we
>>> waiting
>>> on you ?
>>
>> good question indeed. why a
On November 23, 2010 03:26:51 pm Erik Krause wrote:
> What wiki instructions?
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Trackers#Claim_an_Imported_SourceForge_Account
> If you have a wiki article discribing all this in more detail, please
> provide a link instead of giving incomplete instructions here...
Thanks for testing, Matthew.
On November 23, 2010 08:32:23 pm Matthew Petroff wrote:
> Windows XP uses the low bit-depth icons instead instead of the higher
> bit-depth ones
did you check that there are high bit-depth ones? I am using png2ico for the
low bit-depth ones, but for the PNG I have t
Thanks for testing, Terry.
On November 23, 2010 09:57:27 pm Tduell wrote:
> The menu "Applications > Graphics > Hugin Batch Processor" does not
> have an icon.
> As best I can figure it out, that menu item is generated by
> PTBatcherGUI.desktop, which currently defines the icon as
> 'ptbatchergui
Hullo Yuval,
On Nov 23, 6:31 am, Yuval Levy wrote:
[snip]
> Also everything will need testing - I don't have access to Windows and can't
> see if the icons are all right and in the right place; and even on Linux, I
> currently don't have a completely blank system to try, so maybe the icons I
>
Hugin builds fine with the new artwork on Windows. However, the icons
are not quite correct. The first of two issues is the fact that
Windows XP uses the low bit-depth icons instead instead of the higher
bit-depth ones; I don't have Vista or 7, so someone else needs to test
if the PNG part of the i
On Tue, November 23, 2010 5:23 am, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On November 22, 2010 06:17:38 pm michael crane wrote:
>> as I understand things you are not such a hot coder so why are we
>> waiting
>> on you ?
>
> good question indeed. why are you waiting?
It is one of those mysteries. I do not know what
On 23 nov, 20:45, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On November 23, 2010 07:55:08 am Bart van Andel wrote:
> > 4. enter SF handle, e.g. "blabla...@users.sf.net"
>
> finds nearly nothing here. when I enter only "@users.sourceforge.net" it
> finds
> i-root-42 (which I guess was generated by the import process a
Am 23.11.2010 21:00, schrieb Yuval Levy:
If this was not clear enough from my wiki instructions, please update them.
What wiki instructions? I refer to your posting here. You write "Log on
to the [https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin Hugin bug tracker]."
This could indeed indicate that I need a
Hoi Harry,
On November 23, 2010 02:47:28 pm Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> > Mac icons are currently duplicate. There is an Hugin.icns and an
> > HuginFiles.icns in ./src/hugin/hugin.hg/mac/ and ./src/hugin1/hugin/
> >
> > which set is actually used?
> Both are used.
> The Hugin.icns are used for
On November 23, 2010 02:46:16 pm Erik Krause wrote:
> > Perhaps you were not logged in to launchpad?
>
> Of course not. I wanted to claim my SF account. I thought this means
> that my SF account data is automatically transferred to LP and I simply
> need to confirm it using the outlined procedure.
Hi Yuv,
2010/11/22 Yuval Levy
> Hi Mac developers,
>
> Mac icons are currently duplicate. There is an Hugin.icns and an
> HuginFiles.icns in ./src/hugin/hugin.hg/mac/ and ./src/hugin1/hugin/
>
> which set is actually used? is it possible to use only a single set,
> ideally
> the one in ./src/h
Am 23.11.2010 20:16, schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>> * You will land on a pre-filled Merge LP accounts form. Hit the Continue
>> button.
> ...but the Merge LP account form isn't pre-filled. What does this mean?
Perhaps you were not logged in to launchpad?
Of course not. I wanted to claim my SF
On November 23, 2010 07:55:08 am Bart van Andel wrote:
> Ok, I'll clarify.
>
> 1. go to https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin
> 2. enter "advanced search"
> 3. click "choose" next to the "reporter" field
> 4. enter SF handle, e.g. "blabla...@users.sf.net"
finds nearly nothing here. when I enter only
Woh! sorry to read about your dreadful experience...
On November 23, 2010 01:37:16 pm kfj wrote:
> Okay. But having followed the procedure you proposed
I trust you did.
> So I wasn't not quite sure what my SF status was.
Given what you report I am not quite sure what SF's status is.
> So
hey i dont talk to GUIs i talk to GALs...sorry for the bad joke LOL...
anyways, im reading a bit into scripting...i understand mostly perl based
scripting...what do you recommend for beginners?please keep in mind that im
not a programmer...
i need a scripting language that suits the needs ive tol
Erik Krause wrote:
> Am 22.11.2010 17:55, schrieb Yuval Levy:
>> * Make sure your SF account is in good standing and that you are receiving
>> emails at it.
>> * Log on to the [https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin Hugin bug tracker].
>> * Find a ticket or comment that you filed in the old tracker (un
Am 22.11.2010 17:55, schrieb Yuval Levy:
* Make sure your SF account is in good standing and that you are receiving
emails at it.
* Log on to the [https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin Hugin bug tracker].
* Find a ticket or comment that you filed in the old tracker (unfortunately
entering your old us
On 23 Nov., 18:12, john doe wrote:
> thanks for the replu KFJ im working un ubuntu linux..
Ah. Great. Me too. So you have awk, Python, perl if you want it, the
works.
Scripting really is where you take control of computing. GUIs are
nice, but they tend to reach their limits when you want to do
On 23 Nov., 18:17, john doe wrote:
> o have some hugin perl scripts here, the are from some websites but id like
> to contribute with the group and contribute with the creator...
>
> KFJ mind mailing the script?
I'm not sure what you actually mean?
with regards
Kay
--
You received this messa
On 22 Nov., 21:13, Yuval Levy wrote:
> It says "User does not exist" and I realize that I asked you for the wrong
> field. When I look at my SF page it has a User ID *and* a Username. It's the
> Username that I need, sorry.
Okay. But having followed the procedure you proposed, I seem not to
o have some hugin perl scripts here, the are from some websites but id like
to contribute with the group and contribute with the creator...
KFJ mind mailing the script?
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On November 22, 2010 12:12:49 pm kfj wrote:
> > > If you don't have yet a
thanks for the replu KFJ im working un ubuntu linux..
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:47 AM, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Nov., 10:53, paul womack wrote:
> > "back in the day" (g)awk was useful (and I used it).
>
> it is still on every UNIX-like system, ready to go. Ubiquitous.
> Allowed me
> > Yes. Well this is quite strange. Actually in the advanced search page
> > there is a field for "reporter". I am able to find myself there using
> > the built-in search facility. The page shows my sf account name
> > (@users.sf.net) but it also says that no account using this name/
> > email
26 matches
Mail list logo
