[hugin-ptx] Hugin and adding control point detectors OS X

2011-01-31 Thread C
Firstly running OSX 10.6.4, and Hugin 2010.4.0. There was a lengthy period under OS X10.5 that it just was not working, weird results, and a period before that that Hugin was famous. Wonderful. Can see lots of work done by dedicated people over the last year, with four releases last year. So kee

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: JPEG quality preference

2011-01-31 Thread Yuval Levy
oi Harry, On January 31, 2011 08:58:39 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: > I noticed that you set it to 90% quality. Why? I intended to write an email this morning while committing, but time was short. My intention was to go for 80. Or even 79. The reason is: On January 31, 2011 05:00:58 am kfj

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

2011-01-31 Thread dmg
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, PTStitcherNG does this, and it is extremely fast. But the blending is > not so smart, and Helmut remarked somewhere that due to the nature of how it > works (stitch and blend in one step) it couldn't be too smart. A

[hugin-ptx] Stereo image alignment

2011-01-31 Thread Vladimir Nadvornik
Hi, I wrote a tutorial how to use my stereo patches (attached to bug 679753): http://vndlinuxphoto.blogspot.com/2011/01/stereo-image-alignment-in-hugin.html Comments are welcome. Vladimir -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panor

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: exposure getting changed in preview window

2011-01-31 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 31-Jan-2011 at 01:58 -0800, kfj wrote: On 30 Jan., 23:58, Bruno Postle wrote: > EV 0 corresponds to 1 second at f/1.0 with ISO100, it isn't very > likely but it is quite possible for a long exposure. In may case with the Samyang, the aperture would be missing as well. Shutter speed i

Re: [hugin-ptx] 24 hour shot

2011-01-31 Thread David Haberthür
On 31.01.2011, at 19:14, Tim wrote: > Great little planet/star trail combo here: > > http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2011/01/31/24-hours-shot/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=24-hours-shot > > (done with Ptgui so no so free but well worth checking out) That is indeed quite impressiv

[hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

2011-01-31 Thread T. Modes
Hi Habi, > Deliberately not copied over are > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2008_ideas#Lens_DatabaseIs this still > relevant? How does Lensfun et al. do? Yes, still relevant. > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009_idea#hugin_RAW_support Here I don't know. > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009

[hugin-ptx] 24 hour shot

2011-01-31 Thread Tim
Great little planet/star trail combo here: http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2011/01/31/24-hours-shot/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=24-hours-shot (done with Ptgui so no so free but well worth checking out) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

2011-01-31 Thread David Haberthür
Hey All. > > For this to happen, somebody should could collect (copy&paste) the > project > > ideas from the past four editions that have not materialized yet and are > still > > pertinent or just partially implemented and turn each of them into a > blueprint > > [0]. A good place to start

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: JPEG quality preference

2011-01-31 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi Yuv, I noticed that you set it to 90% quality. Why? The first person mentions that he doesn't see the difference between 95-80%, but likes to keep details. The 2 persons who mention that they really use jpeg from Hugin set it to 95%. The person setting it to 90% exports 100% from hugin and in

[hugin-ptx] Re: JPEG quality preference

2011-01-31 Thread kfj
On 31 Jan., 10:57, paul womack wrote: > If you want lossless - don't use JPEG. > > If you use JPEG, you presumably WANT compression. > > So I'd default to somewhere 90-95 (i.e. "high quality") I agree. I usually save to TIFF and only compress to JPEG if I must. Kay -- You received this mess

[hugin-ptx] Re: exposure getting changed in preview window

2011-01-31 Thread kfj
On 30 Jan., 23:58, Bruno Postle wrote: > EV 0 corresponds to 1 second at f/1.0 with ISO100, it isn't very > likely but it is quite possible for a long exposure. > > Maybe Hugin should guess missing EXIF data if any of shutter speed, > aperture or ISO are missing.  Looking at match-n-shift this

Re: [hugin-ptx] JPEG quality preference

2011-01-31 Thread paul womack
Yuval Levy wrote: Hi all, I just committed code to keep persistent preference of output format, including JPEG quality. For now, the default JPEG quality is 100 - is this OK? or what does the majority of users use? For size versus quality, 98 is normally indistinguishable from 100. Note tha

Re: [hugin-ptx] JPEG quality preference

2011-01-31 Thread Jeffrey Martin
me too. 95% would be better IMO. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx