Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread David W. Jones
On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade wrote: >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com >wrote: >> Thanks for your reply. >> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. >> >> Exsample from Enblend: >> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigap

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. > > Exsample from Enblend: > http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm > > Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bi

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Gunter Königsmann
Image cache sounds like something that keeps entire images in memory so they can be accessed faster. What I am not sure is if enblend has a tile cache like the gimp that splits the image into tiles and acts only on as many tiles at a time as fit into the RAM. ... In case that enblend wants to acc

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread jojaeger12031992
Thanks for your reply. Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. Exsample from Enblend: http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger solution. Or is this a different version of enblend? Am Donnerstag, 2. November 201

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0700, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Gunter, > I also see, that the RAM could be to less. > But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate image-cache > option. > > Best Regards, > Johannes The image-cache feature was deprecated in 4.1

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread jojaeger12031992
Hi Gunter, I also see, that the RAM could be to less. But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate image-cache option. Best Regards, Johannes Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2017 19:56:25 UTC+1 schrieb Gunter Königsmann: > > According to my Maxima On Android your output picture will

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Gunter Königsmann
According to my Maxima On Android your output picture will already use up nearly 5 Gigabytes before compression. And I don't know if for stitching the image one "before" and one "after" version has to be kept and how much temporary data is needed for this process. Also I don't know if internally hu

[hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread jojaeger12031992
Hi, I'm trying to build a GigaPano 360°. I have a perfect project file and can generate a Panorama out of it with small width (~6000*3000 pixels) But i want to build it with full size 36092*18046pixels. (72 pictures with 16Bit Tiff) I have to activate the "--fine-mask" option, so *enblend* will