Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: strange issues with 360 pano?

On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 21:50:18 -0700, clepsydrae wrote: > Aha -- it seems to be related to optimization of translation... I inspected > the .pto and saw some extreme-seeming values for TrX, TrY, and TrZ. I > started over and did not optimize translation and the issue doesn't happen. Possibl

Re: [hugin-ptx] strange issues with 360 pano?

Thanks for looking at it! 1. The images are underexposed by about 5 EV. The control point > detectors just can't cope. > Yeah these are actually just the dark frames of a three-exposure bracketed HDR stack. Now that I have things sorted (see above) I'll incorporate the other exposures as

Re: [hugin-ptx] strange issues with 360 pano?

On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 17:50:53 -0700, clepsydrae wrote: > I have uploaded all the test images and the demo .pto here > -- but be warned > that it is a 2GB file. It is uploading now and should be done at the latest > in ~45 minutes (18:30

[hugin-ptx] Re: strange issues with 360 pano?

Aha -- it seems to be related to optimization of translation... I inspected the .pto and saw some extreme-seeming values for TrX, TrY, and TrZ. I started over and did not optimize translation and the issue doesn't happen. I chose to optimize for translation because I was on a crappy tripod with

Re: [hugin-ptx] strange issues with 360 pano?

On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 4:58:30 PM UTC-7, Groogle wrote: > > > Smaller images are fine as long as they show the problem. > ...if the 2GB file is ridiculous I can try to make a small version of the issue... let me know, thanks! -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: ht

Re: [hugin-ptx] strange issues with 360 pano?

Thanks, Groogle -- when the image is stitched, it stitches the same as it does in the preview, with clipped edges, only about half the expected HFOV (although the edges aren't jagged as they appear in the preview, but straight... ? ) Perhaps this .mp4 will make things a bit more clear

Re: [hugin-ptx] strange issues with 360 pano?

On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 15:31:59 -0700, clepsydrae wrote: > Howdy -- I'm attempting a pano made of 14 images (~10mm on a 1.62x APS-C). > CPFind doesn't find CPs well unless I drag the images to a rough correct > overlap, so I do that first. > > Then CPFind finds the CPs, I remove some CPs from

[hugin-ptx] strange issues with 360 pano?

Howdy -- I'm attempting a pano made of 14 images (~10mm on a 1.62x APS-C). CPFind doesn't find CPs well unless I drag the images to a rough correct overlap, so I do that first. Then CPFind finds the CPs, I remove some CPs from the clouds, and optimization (Pos/Trans/View/Barrel) does a good job

Re: [hugin-ptx] missing tile after photometric correction

Hi Andrei, I suspect there is a great amount of image superposition (overlap) there where the tile is missing, is that the case? When I dealt with those problems in the past I used masks to reduce the overlap between images, that helped. Others advice to change the order of the images, th