This is mainly addressed to Thomas Modes, but since it's not the first
time I've seen him behave like this, I think it's time to come out in
the open.
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 10:00:34 -0700, T. Modes wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. September 2018 05:46:34 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>>
>> There is
Thomas,
Thanks for your replies so far. I'm looking at the user defined output
sequences, and am not quite sure where to put the command line and
parameters for big tiff.
from user defined menu the executor file for normal smart blend reads as
follows:
[Step0]
Description=Remapping images
So if I use the builtin blender instead of enblend I can use the —big tiff
switch and that will output BigTIFF?
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin
Sorry, I’ve exhausted my knowledge on how hugin might be calculating and using
these numbers; it doesn’t seem to match the theory written up in the links I
put up.
Would any of the developers / support guys have any thoughts on this for Kai?
Don
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Kai M wrote:
>
Hey Donald,
i tried everything to calculate. But i cant figure out the parameters. The
Exif Data is readable. The Distance was 40cm from the object. Do you think
its possible to calculate it in Pixels?
Best Regards
Kai
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
@Greg
Am Dienstag, 18. September 2018 05:46:34 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>
> There is one at
> https://wiki.panotools.org/Panorama_scripting_in_a_nutshell, but it's
> horribly out of date. I've been meaning to update it, but I've always
> found something more rewarding to do. In particular, it
Am Dienstag, 18. September 2018 01:30:18 UTC+2 schrieb Battle:
>
> HI Thomas,
> I hate to be a kludge, but I'm not finding any development versions of
> Enblend. Maybe I don't know where to look. Looks like the last version at
> source forge is 4.2 in 2016.
>
I know of no binary
