https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.myboyfriendisageek.panostitch
this is a port of hugin, right?
how can they charge money for it?
where is the source code?
how can this be solved?
I just want to bring up the issue. If I am saying something incorrect
please correct me.
thank
It might be worth for people here to report a policy violation
https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/1085703?hl=en
On Monday, February 3, 2014 5:37:05 PM UTC+1, Naked Robot wrote:
sorry, i'm not clear about why they'd be allowed to refuse to give the
source to one
this looks like a normal google account, not a group
if that makes any difference.
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 8:08:51 PM UTC+1, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Mar 4, 2013 1:46 PM, Cristian Marchi cri@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I see that there is a Hugin page on google plus [1] but is not
maybe this is interesting for the group
www.kickstarter.com/projects/1996234044/sphericam-the-easy-360o-video-camera
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
i never got this refine in Autopano sift c to work. Don't use it. Use cp
clean instead.
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:17:11 PM UTC+2, Kunlun121 wrote:
I noticed that the --refine option does work when I load only 7 images of
my panorama into Hugin. No problems in fact. But with the whole
I also get a black screen on my 2008 white macbook.
By the way, can you use the Krpano xml specification for this player? It is
good, and you would get more uptake probably because it would allow more
people to easily use your player with their existing data.
On Friday, October 12, 2012
hi,
We had the idea years ago to use the sun as a way to get proper heading.
Also to use a mountain database, for panos in the mountains.
But in the end, we are 2 or 3 overworked developers with way too many
things to do, and these things are WAY down on the todo list. Sorry :(
On Friday,
it's not possible because you'll have to also warp/remap images that are
aligned in a stack. this is something that you can't do with a raw file (at
least, no one invented such capability yet in any stitcher program that i
know of)
use 16-bit tiffs instead ?
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:07:08
Hey geoff, any progress?
This looks pretty good
http://www.sbg-systems.com/products/ig-500a
probably expensive though!
On Friday, April 27, 2012 1:19:29 AM UTC+2, Geoff G8DHE wrote:
Just an update on progress in using the GPSImageDirection, GPSPitch
GPSRoll.
I have put together a very
in my (reasonably extensive) experience, the multirow option is not robust;
it needs improvement. until then you need to use the detect every image
pair option which is extremely slow. :(
Jeffrey
On Monday, July 9, 2012 2:58:15 AM UTC+2, ecs1749 wrote:
Answering my own question: It appears
Thanks also from me, Harry. You've been a huge help for all of us mac users.
This is a real tragedy if no one else will step up to help. I wish I was
competent enough to do so :(
On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:13:29 PM UTC+2, Florian Wüchner wrote:
Harry,
many thanks for the great job!
I
On Friday, May 18, 2012 12:08:34 AM UTC+2, Bruno Postle wrote:
What is your objection to the exposure correction? You don't want
any exposure correction, even from the EXIF data? or you don't like
the values that the photometric optimisation comes up with?
it sometimes gives bad
hi,
1) agree with jim. replace beginner with simple. and probably
advanced for the second mode, and don't have 3 modes.
2) the one most annoying thing about Hugin is still there: when I
automatically align the images, it also does photometric correction, and
then I don't know how to turn it
that looks interesting. i bet it's not accurate enough for anything useful.
if you buy me one, i'll ask robot boy to whip something together. :)
On Friday, April 6, 2012 5:00:54 PM UTC+2, zarl wrote:
Hi,
what about this one:
https://shop.tinkerforge.com/bricks/imu-brick.html
This one
yes it does.
On Monday, March 26, 2012 1:09:06 AM UTC+2, Karmadillo wrote:
Do your row wrap around 360 degrees? Eg, the last photo in each row
needs to have control point with the first image in that row.
On Mar 24, 12:53 am, Naked Robot 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that when
Just to put it in persective, autopano-sift-c has maxmatches which lets
you limit the number of CP's you generate.
17000 resulted in nearly locking up my 12-core, 128GB of RAM workstation.
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 6:17:43 PM UTC+1, Naked Robot wrote:
i loaded 74 images into hugin
--sieve2width 4 --sieve2size 1
so will this:
--sieve2height 1 --sieve2width 1 --sieve2size 16
which one will give a better spread of CP's?
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 6:17:43 PM UTC+1, Naked Robot wrote:
i loaded 74 images into hugin and generated CP's.
now i have 17,000 CP's
i loaded 74 images into hugin and generated CP's.
now i have 17,000 CP's.
this is insane.
how can i generate fewer CP's?
thank you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
:( :(
On Friday, March 16, 2012 9:56:16 PM UTC+1, David Haberthür wrote:
Dear All
On 09.02.2012, at 22:46, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Thu 09-Feb-2012 at 15:56 +0100, David Haberthür wrote:
Just a heads-up for those who haven't seen it: Google Summer of Code
2012 is on [1]. This means
Is there any way to specify specific overlapped areas for cpfind to look?
i.e. if i pre-align an image, will it help cpfind or not?
this, i think, is what is really missing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software
sounds like a nice idea. :)
what do we have to do to accomplish it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to
Sorry, I'm embarrassed. I had been using autopano-sift-c when i got these
random results.
I guess my question is the same though but it's not about cpfind :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of
Is anyone going to go to this?
http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2012/2012/01/cutting-edge-graphics-software-meets-free-culture/
2-5 May 2012 in Vienna.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of
At this point I have done a ton of research on this.
You can't use a compass by itself because it suffers from a lot of
interference (hard and soft magnetic interference, it's called)
You can use a gyroscope but only for a short time (30 seconds, maybe) and
after that, it 'drifts' and you get
That's interesting! Pitch and Roll are reasonably easy to acquire.
It's the yaw (heading) that is totally unreliable - basically useless - at
this point. There is no sensor that exists (that is economically feasible,
anyway) that can give us this data, in 2012 :(
--
You received this message
I have noticed this also.
Many panos give a consistent same result, but some give a different result
(and different CP) each time. It is very strange.
Can anyone explain why CPFind would give random/different results each time
it is run?
--
You received this message because you are
It was this set of images
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14314213/20120115161554_panorama_1326722096.zip
that gave a really different result each time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
| grep Scale
Scale Factor To 35 mm Equivalent: 3.6
On 17 January 2012 12:46, Naked Robot 360c...@gmail.com wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14314213/_MG_2071.JPG
Hugin is reporting this image to be 35mm scale factor 3.62
Everyone and their grandmother know that a Canon 7d is scale factor 1.6
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14314213/_MG_2071.JPG
Hugin is reporting this image to be 35mm scale factor 3.62
Everyone and their grandmother know that a Canon 7d is scale factor 1.6 (or
thereabouts)
Why is Hugin doing this? :(
I find this very strange!
--
You received this message because you
does anyone have a compiled version for mac available?
Thank you,
Naked Robot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
So your 5x GoPro 360 pano rig is working out well then, Jan? :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this
You're in a country with fast internet. Get a faster internet connection :)
You can also mail Amazon your hard disks (yes really)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is
Ok, :) if you want a normal pc,
-core i7
-24GB ram
-SSD x2
-cheap gpu
-good psu
should be about 800 euro or less. should be very very fast.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
Get a canon 550D
best quality for the best price.
i love it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this
Geoff, with properly calibrated sensors and a decent sensor fusion
algorithm, you should be able to get 0.1º accuracy, I think. But that's the
expensive stuff.
For cheap uncalibrated sensors without any sensor fusion, the results will
be bad - 5º or more.
On Monday, January 9, 2012 12:26:32
I've done quite a bit of research into sensors at it seems that they just
aren't accurate enough.
Only if you spend $500 on a sensor that has been very precisely calibrated
will you get the accuracy I was hoping for.
Those other cheap ones won't be calibrated and will be quite useless. A
Can anyone post a version for OS X that is already compiled, please? :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post
ugh!
I'm totally against the idea of manual seam editing. What are we, clerics
copying documents with a pen? :-DDD We've nearly reached the point where
control points don't need to be manually placed (although, I know of people
who *like* placing control points manually)
So many other parts of
I agree (with both Harry and Erik)
seam optimization is the really big obvious missing feature in multiblend
that would make it a truly amazing tool.
one idea - i see multiblend can blend images that are not overlapping - so
maybe the blending part of the tool is already done, and now we need
specifically, does it use the openCV version of surf?
i just found this comment here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1318691/surf-and-sift-alternative-object-tracking-algorithm-for-augmented-reality
Just wanted to comment that with the latest version of OpenCV the SURF
implementation has
Right. Some bonehead requested that dcraw do this, and somehow it got
implemented.
I asked Dave Coffin to fix it but he just told me where I could remove the
code and recompile. Fair enough I guess :) But it should never be there in
the first place!
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 4:01:07 PM
Kay, Something is wrong.
I know for a fact that canon cameras have a proper orientation exif tag, as
well as the stupid canon only orientation tags.
I say stupid because sometimes they conflict with the proper orientation
tags.
Orientation tag tells you which way the image should be rotated.
see this canon raw file,
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14314213/Screen%20shot%202011-12-15%20at%2012.08.58%20AM.jpg
it has exif orientation tag 8.
http://sylvana.net/jpegcrop/exif_orientation.html
dcraw and all the others certainly do preserve this (and most other) exif
tags.
Jeff
--
You received
so where is it doing the exposure + white balance optimization?
On Friday, December 16, 2011 12:11:10 AM UTC+1, Bruno Postle wrote:
It is using the equivalent of pto_gen, cpfind, celeste_standalone,
linefind, cpclean, autooptimiser, vig_optimize, pano_modify, pto2mk,
nona and enblend (not
44 matches
Mail list logo
