moved the tripod off from over
the nodal point, then the steps you described would also enable me to do
great job here. correct?
Many thanks.
nick
On Friday, November 21, 2014 5:38:31 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 18-Nov-2014 at 18:44 -0800, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
My tests were
So when adding this Nadir with a different viewpoint, you would optimize
for Yaw Pitch and Roll, and also Tpy and Tpp and this should do the trick.
Correct? Or am I missing something?
Thanks, this will be quite usefull.
On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 5:12:02 PM UTC-4, Bruno Postle wrote:
On
What you want to do is possible, for sure.
2 things I'd double check.
Do each images have a different exposure value in the images tab.
Output, have you checked the fused and blended panorama (even if not a
panorama)
If you check anything in the Normal section of the output, I'd expect what
Hi,
When I first started hugin, I wished I could have found a series of images
to practice. Images that were taken with a proper setup to avoid parallax.
Since my setup seems stable, I've released a set of 51 images (17 * 3
exposures) as creative commons.
Feel free to use them for
In my case, whenever I have something in that range of problems, I double
check the exposure value specified for each image, and will typically find
one with a bad value.
That is my only guess at the moment.
nick
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:57 PM, flpm flipmodepl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I
Kudos to you guys for discovering this, and Kudos to keep it open to the
open source community.
Thinking ahead about not having it stolen by another company is nice
forward thinking.
Good luck!
nick
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.comwrote:
You may have
Whatever name comes out, IMHO, having different name for panomatic and the
patent free version seems like simple to do, and create a lot less problems
for people who use more than one CP generator.
My 2 cents
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.comwrote:
The name
When you run the stitching process, do you get any errors in the logging
window? Or does it finish gracefully but without any blended images?
Also, can you confirm enblend is there and working?
Last but not least, what version of hugin exactly on what platform!
Thanks
nick
On Tue, Jul 20,
Hi,
For how to shoot the Nadir image, there are many ways. I use something
similar to what is described here:
http://www.rosaurophotography.com/html/technical6.html
http://www.rosaurophotography.com/html/technical6.htmlThe most important
thing is to test it and be sure you can place the camera
If you want to run panomatic, you can also do it, but it will require you to
run it in waves.
For example, if you have 4 rows, and can only process 2 rows, run row 1 and
2, then row 2 and 3 then row 3 and 4
use pto merge to merge all 3 results and voila!
nick
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:23 AM,
Hi,
The options you are looking for are arguments on autooptimiser:
Usage: autooptimiser [options] input.pto
To read a project from stdio, specify - as input file.
Options:
-o file.pto output file. If obmitted, stdout is used.
Optimisation options (if not specified, no
Make will restart where it left, so you should save some time there.
Out of memory...
Do you use a 64 bit version of enblend? Even the latest 64 build that have
been build run a 32 bit enblend and enfuse.
Also, did you add a memory parameter, kind of -m 5000 (to say use 5 gigs of
ram)? This may
I mostly run command line, but every now and then, I get a very slow
optimization run. The one I just stopped (good timing) was at loop 29 when I
left this morning and was at 30 when back home. So did a loop in about 9
hours.
About one CPU running steadily. Will rerun with less control points
I'm not currently setup to build apart from panomatic.
So in Yuvs comment, I'll foot the first 10$. Specially if it can enable an
install kit (or zip... I don't care) in both 32 and 64 bit to come out on a
regular basis.
nick
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:48 AM, allard a...@allardkatan.net wrote:
Just as a precaution, have you tried to open the images in something else,
like gimp?
Also, more details would be welcome.
Windows\linux\Mac?
What version are you trying to install? from what source?
Thanks
nick
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:02 AM, cath ckuram...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends
This explains the out of memory I got when I tried to ramp up enblend to 6
gig of ram.
To answer to Dex, I second that enblend is a bottleneck on my side as it is
IO bound here... but I did crash up nona for out of memory when remapping an
equirectangular to a very large stereographic output. so
Got the version, will test it through the weekend!
Thanks!
BTW, I brought panomatic to 64 bit. if you want the code and\or the exe,
don't hesitate. For my it enabled using the 4 cores on large images.
nick
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Tom Glastonbury t...@tomglastonbury.comwrote:
A
I second that. Enblend and Enfuse in my case (and sometime nona) are IO
bound, not CPU bound since my images are typically 800 megs in size. (I have
64 bit quad with 8gig ram)
I could help test this build if you would like!
Drop me a line or send me a link!
nick
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:56
I'll add, a few people reported having problem when working in hugin on
multiple projects without closing it. I do remember reproducing some
problems, and the preview windows was on the list.
So, just in case it helps, do you work on multiple projects in a row,
reusing the same running process
Works here, and on all computers I tried.
Have you tried older hugin builds? Do they work?
Have you installed these over the older ones, or besides? Is the old one
still there somewhere?
Zoran, only thing I saw (present in the last 2 builds) is that
celeste_standalone will output the STD_ERR to
Hi,
Between both output, have you changed the Eev value in the preview window?
That is my only guess...
nick
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Klimashkin klimash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I have strange problem.
When I'm doing cylindrical projection by Nona I get good remapped
images:
with a Core2Duo T7700 @ 2.4 with 4 gig ram (64 bit)
The other is a Dell Inspiron (I think, not in front of that one) Core2Quad
with 8gig ram (64 bit also).
Thanks for the builds!
nick
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net wrote:
On Apr 30, 3:36 pm, Nicolas Pelletier
If my memory serves me right, both system have the cheap video card (intel
965 for one.. I expect the same for the other).
As for the tags... I don't mind that celeste does not like them, it does not
like them in the old version either. But in the old, the error is shown on
the command line while
Does this include the patent free CPDetector?
I think it could help me on one problem, but I can't find it in the package.
Not sure about what name it is also...
Many thanks for these win packages BTW. Working perfectly for me!
Thanks,
nick
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Tomasz Nycz
If you take your pictured perfectly around the nodal point, then yes it is
load'n'click.
If not, then you need to help the software correct the mistakes you did :P
Panomatic and autopano don't use the same algorithm (even if somewhat close)
to find CP. You can acheive good result with both. It
I din't see\hear about one yet. Never heard questions either.
nick
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, dsp dspim...@gmail.com wrote:
No responses? How about the easier question - has anyone built a 64
bit version of enblend 4.0 that runs on windows?
best regards, Darcy
On Apr 15, 10:50
Will test that through the weekend! Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net wrote:
Yes!
Finally got Hugin to build again.
Build 5118 is up for grabs at: http://lemur.dreamhosters.com/hugin/
Have fun with it.
--
You received this message because you are
Hey!
Lot's of people seem to have success.
Very bad alignment is not related to the quality of the lens information
since hugin can guess it pretty well IF you let it optimize that
information.
Very bad alignment is related to the quality of control points, parallax
problems and moving stuff in
...
Thanks,
Ricardo
On Apr 19, 7:08 am, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think it's in the official releases yet, but there is the new
stack
feature.
Basically, all the images that are different exposures of the same image,
you assign them the same stack
I don't think it's in the official releases yet, but there is the new stack
feature.
Basically, all the images that are different exposures of the same image,
you assign them the same stack number. Then, whatever the optimization you
do, all of them will end up at exactly the same place.
Output
the
testing.
Thanks,
nick
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Fri 09-Apr-2010 at 07:10 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
In the same line of thinking, is there a way\too\filter to find control
points or make features come out base on a FFT of some sort? Since
Unfortunately, I've have this artifact in each version (from 0.7 till now).
The module responsible seems to be enblend. Therefore, happens in enblend
3.X and 4.
In my experience, 2 factors seem to contribute to this; very wide images
(12k to 15k wide and up seens to be the starting point) and
Thanks all for the help.
Current status:
Autopano was able to stitch only the sharp ones, so same as hugin.
I thought about shooting 2 sets, but this would be lots of work. It will be
a final solution for the next ones if everything else fails... but I'd like
to find an alternative if possible.
Hi,
I'm playing around with one of the intermediate builds (5063) provided by
this wesite (http://lemur.dreamhosters.com/hugin/).
In the image positioning (and optimization parameters) there are 3 new ones,
namely X Y and Z.
Are these the viewpoint or tilt options (not sure what the name is)?
Thanks for the info. I'll try it as a two step for the moment.
Will this work with a spherical at one point, or the algorithms don't permit
that?
Thanks,
nick
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Bruno Postle brunopos...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 9 April 2010 11:20, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet
:45 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Fri 09-Apr-2010 at 08:52 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
Thanks for the info. I'll try it as a two step for the moment.
Will this work with a spherical at one point, or the algorithms don't
permit
that?
I don't know, libpano13 has more than
Hi,
I've run into a situation that I cannot stitch automatically with hugin and
would like any input you guys have.
Basically, I have a pano made of multiple images with a macro lens, shot a
wide aperture (100mm macro at 2.8 with a focusing distance inside the macro
range).
I have multiple
Chris, I've recoded some of this in python. If this is what you're
scripting, msg me and I'll send it to you.
nick
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:11 AM, bruno.postle brunopos...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Feb 1, 6:28 am, Chris Parrish chris.parr...@swankinnovations.com
wrote:
I am building a script
There are some hugin related groups on flickr where you will find some of
the people on this mailing list. Also, a lot of people tag their pictures.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/hugin/ or http://www.fluidr.com/groups/hugin
http://www.flickr.com/groups/hugin/
Ok, enfuse\enblend just finished the overnight process and all seems running
fine. I'll run it command line like I typically do and see if everything is
fine there too. And I'll try cpclean.
Thansk,
nick
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 3:15 AM, allard a...@allardkatan.net wrote:
The link, although an
with pfstools? How does that compare
with hugin?
Bruno Postle-4 wrote:
On Dec 3, 12:58 pm, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Following the original posters request, is there a way (i.e. command
line
tool) to add the crop to the pto automatically? I'd guess
You should use a tripod, but hugin can help when you can't.
As for the number of images, the bare minimum is that you need more bits
than the output.
In short, this means that you will output a LDR in the end, which is
typically 8 bit. So you need more than 8 as an input. Some cameras now take
On thing I want to add in case it is not already clear.
HDR we see on the net are not HDR per say. They are LDR images (like
anything the camera shoots) that was processed to an HDR and then back to an
LDR.
In short:
Multiple exposures LDR = merging = HDR = Processing = LDR that we
typically
Following the original posters request, is there a way (i.e. command line
tool) to add the crop to the pto automatically? I'd guess that the values
are consistent from one picture to another with the same fisheye...
nick
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:40 AM, bruno.postle
Thanks David, that's the one. I never seem to remember that name. Not as
catchy as photomatix :P
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:04 PM, David Haberthür david.haberth...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey all
On 03.12.2009, at 13:56, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
For doing the processing, I think one open source
Thanks, I'll look into that!
nick
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 03-Dec-2009 at 14:23 -0500, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
In order to spend less time doing tedious tasks, I'm trying to have 60-80%
of the process done automatically.
I have a python
Hi,
I'm looking through the wiki and trying the command line tools, but can't
figure it out.
Is there a way through command line to have the exposure for all pictures in
a project set to their exif values? Kind of the same as doing reset to exif
from hugin itself?
Thanks,
nick
--
You
hugin all the time.
I am quite sure there will never be anything that can manage Linux
packages well on Windows -- not only because of technical
difficulties, the market is simply not there.
Regards, Tom
On Nov 10, 10:35 pm, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
For anyone interested, found the problem with the version. Mail me if you
want the source.
nick
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned sourceforge because if I get the 64 bit running properly, there
is no place to upload the changes
Tortoise embeds itself into the explorer. You need to uninstall it (control
panel, add remove programs, then uninstall tortoise).
nick
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM, michael crane mick.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I installed the tortoise server and client thingy on windose vista as
Excellent, Thanks for the info.
nick
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:43 AM, cspiel csp...@freenet.de wrote:
Nicolas -
On Nov 16, 3:54 am, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is the current official version for enblend?
Version 3.2 is current
Hi,
Following what has been said about the windows installer (Thanks Ad, would
not have been hooked on this without those), I'm wondering something.
What is the current official version for enblend? Is 4.0 out (and I missed a
mail) or is 3.2 still the official stable release?
Since I'm also in
Hi Bob,
Which is generating the problem? Panomatic? Both?
Can you add the output of the tool causing the problem?
I know for a fact that Panomatic is memory thirsty; depending on if I'm
running full scale images or not, I have to limit myself to 1 or 2 cores
(i.e. 1 or 2 images loaded at the
Hi,
Since building hugin on windows is not so trivial as on other platforms
(thanks to the package manager on linux), I was wondering a few things.
A little researched showed that there are now a few package managers that
work on windows. Has this been looked into as a solution for hugin?
Also,
I can confirm I have the problem with the latest alpha build.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
J. Schneider wrote:
and indeed it is likely an installer issue.
OK, so it's not worth filing an official bug. Hope Ad has read this
thread.
I'm looking at
I don't know exactly the difference, but would expect that it is related to
the way the output is done.
This being said, here is what is configured in the latest builds for what
you mentioned
Panomatic: autopano-sift
match n shift: autopano-sift
align image stack: autopano-sift
hope this helps
Hey guys,
I just spend a little more time on the setup. Didn't get enblend to build
yet, but getting closer. I update the wiki with what I did in case somebody
tries to setup.
As I was reading this thread for a few walls I've been hitting... I saw that
one of my assumptions was probably wrong. I
I think the information stated here still stands:
http://panospace.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/give-a-man-a-fish/
http://panospace.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/give-a-man-a-fish/You can still
get less official builds from Ad H.
I don't know what problems with enblend enfuse are still present (or if
5. A better control points generator is Pano-O-matic. It is covered by
the SURF patent. You can find it on the web, but it is very unlikely
that it will make it into the official Hugin binary distribution. You
can make it work for you if you know what you are doing.
That was new to me. I tried it
if it's still the case, but as written in [hugin-ptx]
(Probably very basic) help needed for build process on WinXP: missing
files?, at that time the current enblend didn't compile. So you might
need
to get revision 523.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:00, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet
.
Regards, Tom
On Oct 14, 4:44 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 16:09 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
I'm not convinced it is a post processing step. I think it depends on
where
we draw the what should hugin do boundary.
I guess that where I'm coming from
Hi,
I'm setting up everything to build hugin following these instructions (
http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK)
As I'm building enblend, it is obvious that the SDK linked in there and the
source code for enblend don't match in regards to the dependency and the
folder
projects.
only my 2 cents...
nick
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 10:29 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
This is currently set up as a one to one match, but should be a one to
many
I think:
The first part could be done with (one
Awesome. This will be quite useful (specially for some nadir shot that I
badly took and invested quite some time to redo).
I'm always impressed by the power of this software, and where it is going.
nick
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 10-Sep-2009
My 2 cents...
I've been on the list as a user lately, but may transition to the dark side.
I think splitting the list so that all the hardcore details are in another
(public) list may be good... I'm just afraid that developers will not be on
the user list... I think this does make this list what
Thanks all for this, I was investigating options for this.
One thing that most options don't do (but I thing that the stack number
thing could do it. Can you confirm Bruno?)
In most cases, the normal (i.e. 0 ev) exposure will be good enough to use
as the reference for positioning images (i.e.
Thanks,
I'll try to have my dev setup in time to beta test this when the issue is
resolved.
nick
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 03-Sep-2009 at 10:54 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
One thing that most options don't do (but I thing
Thanks, I'll check into that option.
The SWIG option might be good also, but I'll need to finish my dev setup
before I get there...
Thanks,
nick
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Mon 31-Aug-2009 at 20:03 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
I also looked
Hi,
Is there a way with hugin to get all the logs we see on the screen (i.e. the
autopano sift C, and at the generation, the nona enblend enfuse) and have
them output in a file? The window closes at the end, and I'd sometime like
to look into what exactly was done.
Maybe simpler, since everything
are projects portable?
for example, create a hugin project, import images, and do a few other
things. Save, close hugin.
Copy hugin to a USB key. Copy project folder with all images (everything was
set-up in same folder) onto a folder on the USB key...
Connect usb key to another computer. Can I
@Flo
http://hugin.huikeshoven.org/
http://hugin.huikeshoven.org/Take the one flagged as RC5. I think the
link issue has been fixed in APSC (the thing that creates and matches points
between images) in that one. If not, msg again, Tom provided a link at one
point (I'm using that one). Even if you
to Andreas Huggel of
exiv2.
not much more that we at Hugin can do.
thank you for your patience.
Yuv
Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
Another note, I've put a few more details in the 7z. I've also included
the
CR2 txt file with all the exif info.
I use Adobe Photoshop Elements Catalog to keep
When you say the results are in shreds, are you looking at the final stitch,
or the fast preview?
I got one stitch that (don't know why) will give extremely weird results in
the fast preview.
The regular preview gives better results in that case.
As for the few control point way out, I'd
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Bart van Andel bavanan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 aug, 02:04, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I expected:
Take the 36 images (12 per exposure).
Enblend the first exposure
Enblend the second exposure
Enblend the third exposure
a strange Exif
data block. All of their digital cameras are quite consistent in this
respect.
Cheers, Tom
On Aug 2, 11:28 pm, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Nicolas Pelletier
Elements (mostly when I want to get 16 bits
output).
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
nick
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
merci Nicolas!
TIFF don't come straight out of the Canon 50d? so what software are you
using to convert the RAW to TIFF?
Yuv
Nicolas Pelletier
In case it helps...
Through processing some other stuff, I saw that jpeg - tiff through the
same software, the tiff lens info will be read properly from hugin...
nick
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Another note, I've put a few more
I read somewhere that hugin should recognize what focal length was used by
the exif.
It seems to work when I take pictures from my old camera, but not my new
one. Both go through the same process, and both have proper exif info in the
tiff.
Is there a step I missed somewhere to have this
In case it has impact, I'm in Vista 64 bit.
Thanks
nick
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
I read somewhere that hugin should recognize what focal length was used
by
the exif.
It seems to work when I take pictures from my old camera
Upgrade exiftool not working.
Had 774, changed for 782.
I'll check the other tool you mentioned.
nick
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try the upgrade.
It is a Canon 50D. Came out last October, so fairly new.
I can run exiftool
I'd think).
And about what you said, I totally agree. The fact that hugin can stack and
enfuse images with original bad alignment (i.e. hand held) is a great
advantage.
nick
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 29-Jul-2009 at 11:23 -0400, Nicolas
Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
Upgrade exiftool not working.
Had 774, changed for 782.
do I understand right that exiftool 774 could read info out of a Canon
50D and exiftool 782 could not?
Sorry, was not clear; skipped part of the ino. I meant, hugin was installed
with v774. Any image I
and every warped image, and then emblend them. seems like double the work...
Thanks for the help.
nick
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net wrote:
Try running enblend with -a -l 20.
I got a nice 3x speed up compared to defaults.
On Jul 28, 2:07 am, Nicolas Pelletier
does the whole process take?
Thanks,
nick
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
USB 2.0
I'll copy to local disk and retry. Thanks for the input.
nick
Stephen
Leacockhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/stephen_leacock.html -
I
I don't know if this is the same thing, but I get whitish\yellowish
horizontal lines, each line a few pixel high with black dots at irregular
interval on the lines.
They are perfectly horizontal (i.e. follow a pixel row perfectly)
Size is 23284*11642 and it's a 360*180
I generated 3 exposure
USB 2.0
I'll copy to local disk and retry. Thanks for the input.
nick
Stephen
Leacockhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/stephen_leacock.html
- I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue that I shall some
day
die, which is not so.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Dale Beams
See this thread for the ongoing discussion about version numbers
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/200d756a3434ef9f/5ab4794e9e90554f?lnk=gstq=What's+in+a+Version+Number%3F#5ab4794e9e90554f
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Milo van der Linden
consider what could be done to improve
distribution.
--Tom
On Jul 17, 5:51 am, Nicolas Pelletier nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com
wrote:
If my time estimate is good, RC4 has the leak, RC5 does not.
I'll upgrade and see.
Thanks,
nick
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Scott
If my time estimate is good, RC4 has the leak, RC5 does not.
I'll upgrade and see.
Thanks,
nick
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Scott scrosb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 1:13 pm, Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com wrote:
There have been several reports of out-of-memoryerrors while
In my opinion, the why, if, exif and all should come back to one question.
I have 2 pictures I need to stitch. One if portrait, one is landscape.
Will any of the module end up with a different result than if I had 2
portraits.
I don't mean 2 lens vs 1. But will the control points be different?
Thanks for the info.
I'll be sure I have them all lined up the same way before the next panorama.
Which they typically are. Only the bottom shot gets sometime interpreted by
the camera as a landscape.
And yes, I was talking about the original orientation of the image.
Since we are in the topic
ok, so there is something wrong. Your's did not just run because you had
access to more memory... 600megs is far from it.
Thanks,
nick
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Seb Perez-D sbp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:10, Nicolas
Pelletiernicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
When you say you want to imitate a wide lens, do you simply mean you want a
picture that is larger than what the original lens let you take? Or do you
imply something more?
Thanks,
nick
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Lode lodeame...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a user question:
I
Thanks for the info.
nick
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 16-Jul-2009 at 08:11 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
Since we are in the topic of lens sharing. I would guess the reason I
cannot
share a lens for images of different size is the same
Hi,
Can I use hugin to transform a panorama from one projection to another?
Kind of, use hugin to generate a 360*180 cylindrical panorama. Do a few
touch-ups in gimp. Now use hugin to take the corrected 360*180 and generate,
for example, a stereographic projection?
Same question, but for QTVR
When I wrote the original post, hugin was still running, so I did not know
if the input would come out.
As you said, it does.
I don't know if the result is 100% the same as if the lenses were setup as 2
instead of one, but it seemed ok!
Thanks,
nick
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Bruno
need to investigate it
more.
Andrew
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Tried some more cases to try and find something weird.
Unfortunately, nothing.
I consistently run out of memory, whenever I take big images (threeshold
seems
you can
set this setting with. Try setting this to something like 1200 or 800.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Andrew, I appreciate.
In my case, the out of memory happens in the first phase, i.e. when
searching for keypoints
Hi,
Are there 64bit versions for some\all of the hugin package? Looking for
APSC, Enblend, Enfuse and hugin.
Thanks,
nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software
So hugin works in 64.
What about APSC, enblend and enfuse?
Thanks,
nick
Milton Berle http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/milton_berle.html
- If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Ryan Sleevi
ryan+hu...@sleevi.comryan%2bhu...@sleevi.com
wrote:
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
