On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Bart van Andel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 3 aug, 02:04, Nicolas Pelletier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What I expected: > > Take the 36 images (12 per exposure). > > Enblend the first exposure > > Enblend the second exposure > > Enblend the third exposure > > Enfuse the 3 exposures > > By taking the following approach, you allow for the bracketed images > to be aligned less than perfectly (e.g., hand held). Your approach > will probably fail on hand held images because of imperfect alignment > between stacks. > Then there is something I probably don't understand... I thought that once nona was run, enblend and enfuse had no impact to alignment, everything had already been calculated\preprocessed. enblend and enfuse would only use this information. Also, about the handheld... let's use a hypothetical "dumb" way of doing multiple exposure. Let's say a fish eye, so 3 pictures to do a 360 degree (0, 120 and 240). I do 9 shots 0 ev at 0 120 240 +2 ev at 40 160 280 -2 ev at 80 200 320 All the information to do a properly enfused 360 degree is available, but would the current process allow for it? (I know, dumb setup, but curious to understand). Thanks Oh, and Bruno, thanks for the info, I've checked quickly the mk file, but didn't grasp the internal of the file in the 2 minutes invested. May look a little longer. nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
