If there was one thing that I would improve process-wise this year, it would
be using blueprints [0] on Launchpad to track/develop ideas and student
proposals.
I wanted to add my idea about defining straight from the beginning of
December (now I realize how long ago it was) lines into
On February 9, 2011 07:00:45 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
from the descriptions when registering new blueprint it
seems to me that it's supposed only to be a list of proposed ideas
with short description of each.
Yes. The entry there is a summary of the use case, relatively immutable. Not
the
On 9 February 2011 13:51, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On February 9, 2011 07:00:45 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
from the descriptions when registering new blueprint it
seems to me that it's supposed only to be a list of proposed ideas
with short description of each.
Yes. The entry there
Ciao Jeff
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 22:59, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not see a delete button there. only these:
Change details
Mark superseded
Re-target blueprint
Subscribe
Subscribe someone else
anyway, thanks!
I've marked my blueprint superseded by yours, so it's
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/improve-seam-optimization
but then I saw you made one also. Can you please delete mine (or yours) ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
On 07.02.2011, at 21:20, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/improve-seam-optimization
but then I saw you made one also. Can you please delete mine (or yours) ?
I've marked my entry superseded by yours, since you've added more information.
Just out of
I do not see a delete button there. only these:
- Change
detailshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/improve-seam-optimization/+edit
- Mark
supersededhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/improve-seam-optimization/+supersede
- Re-target
Hey Jeffrey
On 28.01.2011, at 09:07, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
I have another idea - what about a new blender (or improving Enblend)? I am
always a bit bummed when I think about how superior smartblend is - it's 5
years old and at point very slow, but it's still better than e.g. Enblend.
Could
Hey Daniel
I just did a very simple tests. My computer has a SSD, hence I think
the results are skewed:
This is PTmender, run 3 times:
Voluntary Context Switches 2; real 2.72; sys 0.05
Voluntary Context Switches 2; real 2.73; sys 0.09
Voluntary Context Switches 1; real 2.73; sys 0.06
On 1 February 2011 01:07, dmg wrote:
I just did a very simple tests. My computer has a SSD, hence I think
the results are skewed:
This is PTmender, run 3 times:
Voluntary Context Switches 2; real 2.72; sys 0.05
Voluntary Context Switches 2; real 2.73; sys 0.09
Voluntary Context Switches
Hey All.
For this to happen, somebody should could collect (copypaste) the
project
ideas from the past four editions that have not materialized yet and are
still
pertinent or just partially implemented and turn each of them into a
blueprint
[0]. A good place to start are the
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, PTStitcherNG does this, and it is extremely fast. But the blending is
not so smart, and Helmut remarked somewhere that due to the nature of how it
works (stitch and blend in one step) it couldn't be too smart. And
Yes, PTStitcherNG does this, and it is extremely fast. But the blending is
not so smart, and Helmut remarked somewhere that due to the nature of how it
works (stitch and blend in one step) it couldn't be too smart. And if it
makes a mistake in the beginning of the process, then it's all over.
I have another idea - what about a new blender (or improving Enblend)? I am
always a bit bummed when I think about how superior smartblend is - it's 5
years old and at point very slow, but it's still better than e.g. Enblend.
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:31:56 PM UTC+1, David Haberthür
Hey
I'm supposedly a bit less busy with work this summer, so I'd like to help
wherever possible to give back something to hugin et al. I don't think I
can (and would) manage the effort alone, but I'd be happy to help wherever
I can: Where can I start? For starters, I've made a wiki-page for
If I may, can I suggest continuing the vertical line and/or horizon
detector project? I think a few people can back me up in saying that this
kind of thing (even if not 100% reliable) is sorely missing, and is making
the possibility of really automated streetview-type panos not really
Hey Jeffrey
On 27.01.2011, at 16:58, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
If I may, can I suggest continuing the vertical line and/or horizon
detector project? I think a few people can back me up in saying that this
kind of thing (even if not 100% reliable) is sorely missing, and is making
the
done.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/vertical-line-horizon-detector
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
On Thu 27-Jan-2011 at 13:31 +0100, David Haberthür wrote:
Thank you for picking this up!
Even If I volunteered to start, I'd very much not like to do this
completely on my own, since I didn't closely follow the process
last year. I'd be glad for some more shoulders to put some weight
on...
On 25.01.2011, at 13:45, Yuval Levy wrote:
does anybody care to take care of this?
Yuv
Hey
I'm supposedly a bit less busy with work this summer, so I'd like to help
wherever possible to give back something to hugin et al.
I don't think I can (and would) manage the effort alone, but I'd be
On January 25, 2011 04:05:44 pm David Haberthür wrote:
On 25.01.2011, at 13:45, Yuval Levy wrote:
does anybody care to take care of this?
Yuv
Hey
I'm supposedly a bit less busy with work this summer, so I'd like to help
wherever possible to give back something to hugin et al. I don't
21 matches
Mail list logo
