Thanks for your reply, Carlos.
Aligning the resulting equirectangular projections is an option, but I was
hoping to avoid having to filter the images twice, so as to keep the most
sharpness.
Cheers,
lensfun
On Monday, September 10, 2012 5:18:53 AM UTC-7, Cartola wrote:
Have you tried to
Hmm, not sure why my previous message got deleted.
Here it is again:
Thanks, Carlos.
Aligning the resulting equirectangular projections is indeed an option, but
I was hoping to find a way to do it within the stitching process, to avoid
loosing any quality by double-processing the source
On 10 September 2012 22:08, panfun stuffandc...@gmail.com wrote:
Aligning the resulting equirectangular projections is indeed an option, but
I was hoping to find a way to do it within the stitching process, to avoid
loosing any quality by double-processing the source images.
Something like,
2012/9/11 Bruno Postle brunopos...@googlemail.com
Though the loss of data from remapping a second time is negligible, so
I wouldn't worry about this very much.
I share this opinion.
Another option (besides stitch all toguether as Bruno said) is to use the
equirectangular just to align the
Hi,
I just started using hugin recently, and while I've been reading a lot, I
could use some help/guidance from the experts here.
Case at hand:
I have multiple 360 panoramas, taken from the same position, at different
times of day, using a motorized head.
However, there are slight rotation
Have you tried to align them after they are finished? Don't know if this is
the best option, but I did it in this case here:
http://wp.me/p1AGa0-ih
The second picture was taken more than one year after the other and I
aligned the two equirectangular at the end. I did it manually into hugin,
but
