[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste and 16bit photos

2009-10-07 Thread Tim Nugent
Hmmm that's strange. Could someone send me a link to the 16-bit tiffs and I'll have a look tonight. Tim Bruno Postle wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 04:55 -0700, grow wrote: So it seems that Celeste is not as good at removing control points on 16-bit TIFF images. This is odd, according to

[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste and 16bit photos

2009-10-07 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi Tim, you can download the jpeg images and use ImageMagick's convert or graphicsmagick gm to convert to 16 bit tiff. I did that and celeste works. Next to that: I still have Georges hotel village 16bit images (from the other topic). If I use them, celeste works also. This almost looks like

[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste and 16bit photos

2009-10-07 Thread rew
On Oct 7, 7:17 pm, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote: you can download the jpeg images and use ImageMagick's convert or graphicsmagick gm to convert to 16 bit tiff. George's dataset is quite large, but you need only about 3 images from his dataset to trigger the enblend bug. Roger.