Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 19:07:26 UTC+1 schrieb Spencer Egart:
#! /bin/sh
FOV=125.2430276873036
pto_gen --projection=0 --fov=$FOV -o project1.pto $@
This look suspicious for me. A rectilinear (normal) lens with a HFOV of
125 deg is very unusual. This would correspond to a focal length
I wonder then if anyone can tell me what I'm doing wrong, because I'm
getting extremely different results every time. I have a template for the
camera orientations which I'm setting via pto_var, but would like to
fine-tune that via control points. I'm running the following script on a
set of
Hello Spencer,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 05:07:25 +1100, Spencer Egart spenc...@google.com
wrote:
I wonder then if anyone can tell me what I'm doing wrong, because I'm
getting extremely different results every time. I have a template for
the
camera orientations which I'm setting via pto_var,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:04:10 +1100, Terry Duell tdu...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
Do you provide your input images in the same order each time? Changing
the order that the input images are passed to the script will alter the
anchor image, and hence the optimisation results.
Sorry, not
Enblend is the tool that figures out where to blend the lines, it seams to
have a randomness when figuring some parts of where to blend photos
together. I have tested it a lot and near as I can tell that is the only
part in my work flow that changes much and it is just a little here and
there.
