Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: bug cpclean and line control points

2013-07-05 Thread T. Modes
Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013 23:57:14 UTC+2 schrieb Jim Watters: I think the worst cp should always be removed. But would be happy with a flag to have this ability. In the default branch cpclean has now an option to include line cp for filtering. Thomas -- A list of frequently asked

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: bug cpclean and line control points

2013-07-05 Thread Jim Watters
On 2013-07-05 12:59 PM, T. Modes wrote: Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013 23:57:14 UTC+2 schrieb Jim Watters: I think the worst cp should always be removed. But would be happy with a flag to have this ability. In the default branch cpclean has now an option to include line cp for filtering.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: bug cpclean and line control points

2013-07-03 Thread Gnome Nomad
On 07/02/2013 06:35 AM, T. Modes wrote: Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 19:40:20 UTC+2 schrieb Jim Watters: cpclean will not remove bad line control points. This is intentional. Cpclean will currently only remove normal cp. All line control points are ignored (also for calculation of

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: bug cpclean and line control points

2013-07-03 Thread T. Modes
Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013 23:57:14 UTC+2 schrieb Jim Watters: The problem of line control points is exaggerated because the optimizer gives more weight to them. This is new to me. I thought the optimizer treats all cp the same. Can you give a source? Or give a hint, where in the source

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: bug cpclean and line control points

2013-07-02 Thread Jim Watters
On 2013-07-02 1:35 PM, T. Modes wrote: Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 19:40:20 UTC+2 schrieb Jim Watters: cpclean will not remove bad line control points. This is intentional. Cpclean will currently only remove normal cp. All line control points are ignored (also for calculation of