Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: setting the output to high dynamic range

2022-08-02 Thread David W. Jones
On 8/1/22 13:07, johnfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 5:44:47 PM UTC-4 GnomeNomad wrote: I have panoramas that were about 2GB as 16-bit TIFFs that became about 600-700MB as 100% quality JPGs. So what quality setting are your JPGs at to give you a 15x

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: setting the output to high dynamic range

2022-08-01 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 5:44:47 PM UTC-4 GnomeNomad wrote: > > > I have panoramas that were about 2GB as 16-bit TIFFs that became about > 600-700MB as 100% quality JPGs. So what quality setting are your JPGs at > to give you a 15x difference? > My results are somewhere between those.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: setting the output to high dynamic range

2022-08-01 Thread David W. Jones
On 8/1/22 08:48, Maarten Verberne wrote: thanks, John, David, the first problem from an older post is solved by using my office program to create the files i need.works for me. tiff vs JPG,  fair enough, it could be this specific example, so i'll make some more and also test them in a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: setting the output to high dynamic range

2022-08-01 Thread Maarten Verberne
thanks, John, David, the first problem from an older post is solved by using my office program to create the files i need.works for me. tiff vs JPG, fair enough, it could be this specific example, so i'll make some more and also test them in a different program. as for disk space, well

[hugin-ptx] Re: setting the output to high dynamic range

2022-08-01 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 2:51:54 PM UTC-4 mpgve...@gmail.com wrote: > i do not understand where i can enter those command, i did not see a teminal field in the gui and windows command prompt says it does not know nona. You use some form of windows command prompt and you do something to fix