Would Smartblend [which can deal with parallax reasonably well] not be
useful in this application?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new focus only for the normal lenses it
possibile create a good automatic panorama program; i find some
On 21/11/11 14:14, mark skama wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new focus only for the normal lenses it
possibile create a good
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:04:20 +0100, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
On 21/11/11 14:14, mark skama wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new
2011/11/21 Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu
On 21/11/11 14:14, mark skama wrote:
the program most be freeware but source closed
write in c++ and wxwidgets
the budget start from 100 €
There's another little problem with a closed source fork: the program
is licensed under the GPL.
To
On 21 November 2011 14:14, mark skama melonefre...@libero.it wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new focus only for the normal
On 21 Nov, 14:14, mark skama melonefre...@libero.it wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new focus only for the normal lenses it
I'm thinking this might be a problem of use/understanding/interface
metaphone. Hugin harnesses some very powerful and complex tools and
leaves a lot of room for user choices and modification so as to be
most flexible for any need. Because of this it can be rather hard to
learn to use (it gives you
That's interesting. It looks like it uses the camera's orientations
sensor to select the angle of the strip of image it captures. As you
turn the camera the strips stay vertical to the finished panorama. Did
you sweep from right to left?
It would be interesting to hack the software (but don't
this is interesting. It's also helpful to mess around with the target
image and see how the various perspectives and features work. I made a
target image as you described. I'm not too familiar with GIMP but It
seemed to work out nicely.
If anyone can tell me how to post an image on here, I'd be
On 21/11/11 18:39, mark skama wrote:
On 21 Nov, 14:14, mark skama melonefre...@libero.it wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new
Please clarify this for me as I want to make sure I understand (and it
may be helpful to other newer Panorama makers like myself.)
These are my assumptions:
1.) Only the actual horizon should be assigned as a horizontal
line (unless you just want some line, or the average of some lines,
to be
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:59:46 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Mon 21-Nov-2011 at 13:56 -0800, JohnPW wrote:
Please clarify this for me as I want to make sure I understand (and it
may be helpful to other newer Panorama makers like myself.)
These are my assumptions:
1.) Only the actual horizon should
On Mon 21-Nov-2011 at 18:37 -0500, Robert Krawitz wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:59:46 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
1.) Only the actual horizon should be assigned as a horizontal
line (unless you just want some line, or the average of some
lines, to be straight and at the horizontal center
RAW images are generally linear but not always.
I worked through an issue with Adobe earlier this year to update their RAW
converter software to address some of the non-linearities introduced by
certain Canon SLR modes.
Since Hugin doesn't work with RAW files, images you feed it will almost
The Apple UFO Campus Building exception. ;-)
On Nov 21, 5:43 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
. . . What about equirectangular or cylindrical (or Mercator)?
In these projections the only features in the scene that will be
horizontal in the output image are: the horizon at sea, or
These days I usually set that camera to pan in the direction of right to
left, with the camera held portrait.
On 21 November 2011 21:16, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's interesting. It looks like it uses the camera's orientations
sensor to select the angle of the strip of image it
17 matches
Mail list logo
