First of all I must apologize to Jan for calling you Jeffrey :. I
guess I have been too much on 360Cities.
Jim, your experience with time lapse is interesting. Perhaps the CP
finders depend too much on tonal gradients, that vary with the
lighting. It must be tone, since they all work with
Is the SURF scale and orientation independent per each identified feature
or ar they somehow liked within an image? Is distorsion somehow factored
in?
A thought on unevenly placed CP that often turns out to be a problem for
me. Maybe look at what align_image_stack does. It seems to divide the
Thank you Tom for your testing and feedback.
I had the auto control point generators fail also on a past project where I was
taking a pano each day setting a tripod in roughly the same place. The cp
generators would find matches within a days images but would never find matches
from one
On 13 Okt., 21:23, Jan Martin janmar...@diy-streetview.org wrote:
HI all,
I have 8 images around with hfov of 50 degrees and one fisheye with hfov
with 120 degrees for the Zenith.
So autopano-sift-c 2.5.2 fails, because it assumes all image
- having the same hfov.
- having the same
I reckon the best one of the commonly installed ones for the situation
is Panomatic, because it tries to create CPs for every pair of images
in the set by default. So the zenith shot will be compared to every
single one of the others, increasing the probability of finding a
match [please correct
