Hey, just to throw a monkey-wrench into the works, I've just completed
some (pretty minor, actually) updates to the libpano13-2.9.17 code (I
got the svn trunk) so that it compiles* for Solaris on Sparc. It even
passes the 'make check', so all the tools build, etc. Don't have an
x86 Solaris box,
Hey, just to throw a monkey-wrench into the works, I've just completed
some (pretty minor, actually) updates to the libpano13-2.9.17 code (I
got the svn trunk) so that it compiles* for Solaris on Sparc. It even
passes the 'make check', so all the tools build, etc. Don't have an
x86 Solaris box,
On Thu 22-Jul-2010 at 13:43 -0700, Bob Campbell wrote:
Hey, just to throw a monkey-wrench into the works, I've just completed
some (pretty minor, actually) updates to the libpano13-2.9.17 code (I
got the svn trunk) so that it compiles* for Solaris on Sparc. It even
passes the 'make check', so
Continuing my list of things to do for this release, we are now a
bit further along:
A libpano13-2.9.17 release
Still needed.
Thomas noted a bug calculating angle of view for panoramas with
mosaics, I'm not sure if this is libpano13 or Hugin bug?
Do something with translations, even if
Gee, with Mercurial, this sort of stuff is supposed to... Just Work! :)
Umm... did it?
eo
On Jun 28, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Sat 26-Jun-2010 at 17:15 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
So we need to create a Hugin branch, then:
Increment the version numbers in both the 'stable'
Am Dienstag, 29. Juni 2010 schrieb Tduell:
Hullo Kornel,
On Jun 28, 4:29 pm, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Am Montag, 28. Juni 2010 schrieb Tduell:
abort: There is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)!
-- New ChangeLog generated
Maybe the solution is
On June 29, 2010 03:41:04 am Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Juni 2010 schrieb Tduell:
I don't understand why the test for .hg didn't fail gracefully for
Yuv.
Because there _is_ a .hg in ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}. But the
execute_process() is called from the build-directory. Therefore
On June 29, 2010 02:14:46 am Eric O'Brien wrote:
Gee, with Mercurial, this sort of stuff is supposed to... Just Work! :)
it Just Works either way, so it does not really matter.
Yuv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic
On Tue 29-Jun-2010 at 22:41 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
did you commit the patch? if not, please do.
I did not. If I understood correctly, Bruno was not satisfied with
the outcome. But OK, with the patch it works at least.
I didn't think I needed to comment, if you think something like
On June 29, 2010 04:59:48 pm Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 29-Jun-2010 at 22:41 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
did you commit the patch? if not, please do.
I did not. If I understood correctly, Bruno was not satisfied with
the outcome. But OK, with the patch it works at least.
I didn't
On Tue 29-Jun-2010 at 17:44 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
IMHO it is good to keep the ChangeLog generation manual. It makes
the person who does the release stop and think, amongst others of
updating authors.txt
Yes the ChangeLog has only ever been generated if you build with
cmake
Am Dienstag, 29. Juni 2010 schrieb Bruno Postle:
On Tue 29-Jun-2010 at 22:41 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
did you commit the patch? if not, please do.
I did not. If I understood correctly, Bruno was not satisfied with
the outcome. But OK, with the patch it works at least.
I didn't
Am Montag, 28. Juni 2010 schrieb Tduell:
abort: There is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)!
-- New ChangeLog generated
Maybe the solution is to just remove the test for .hg.
Anyone see any problems with that?
If you call hg to get some info, there has to be a directory
I took a stab at this one and just updated the wiki for *Layout tab*
I just realized the *Move/drag* description on the same page does not
mention what *normal/mosaic* mode means. So I also added something short
here.
Btw these are new undefined concepts that may require proper definitions...
On Sat 26-Jun-2010 at 17:15 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
So we need to create a Hugin branch, then:
Increment the version numbers in both the 'stable' branch and the
'trunk'.
Ok, I *think* I've done this, there should now be a 2010.2 branch in
addition to the default 'tip' which now builds
Hullo Kornel,
On Jun 28, 4:29 pm, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Am Montag, 28. Juni 2010 schrieb Tduell:
abort: There is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)!
-- New ChangeLog generated
Maybe the solution is to just remove the test for .hg.
Anyone see any
Hullo Bruno,
On Jun 29, 7:07 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sat 26-Jun-2010 at 17:15 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
Increment the version numbers in both the 'stable' branch and the
'trunk'.
Ok, I *think* I've done this, there should now be a 2010.2 branch in
addition to the
Hi Terry,
On Jun 26, 8:14 pm, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
You still have to run `cmake -DUPDATE_CHANGELOG=1` to intentionally
update the ChangeLog.
I've tried it. because I build out of tree, it did not work properly.
but it did turn the existing ChangeLog into an empty file:
cd
Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2010 schrieb Yuv:
Hi Terry,
On Jun 26, 8:14 pm, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
You still have to run `cmake -DUPDATE_CHANGELOG=1` to intentionally
update the ChangeLog.
I've tried it. because I build out of tree, it did not work properly.
but it did turn the
Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2010 schrieb Yuv:
Hi Terry,
On Jun 26, 8:14 pm, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
You still have to run `cmake -DUPDATE_CHANGELOG=1` to intentionally
update the ChangeLog.
I've tried it. because I build out of
On Sat 26-Jun-2010 at 21:41 -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote:
The exact way varies depending upon the exact log options, but it's
easy to get a list of everyone with something like this:
$ hg log |grep '^user:' | sed -e 's/^user:\s*//' -e 's/\s*.*$//' | sort | uniq
This gives a list of everyone
Hullo Yuv,
On Jun 27, 5:15 pm, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Hi Terry,
On Jun 26, 8:14 pm, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
You still have to run `cmake -DUPDATE_CHANGELOG=1` to intentionally
update the ChangeLog.
I've tried it. because I build out of tree, it did not work properly.
but
On Jun 24, 5:35 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Can we try and get an idea of tasks that need to be done?
* The documentation [0] needs to be updated for Mercurial. I have
updated the Ubuntu docs [1] four weeks ago to about 90%. I don't know
about the docs for other O/S.
* Wish: a
Am Samstag 26 Juni 2010 schrieb Yuv:
[1] http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Ubuntu
Hi Yuv,
in Building Environment:
missing cmake
Apart from that, I could not find another mistake.
Regards
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
2010/6/26 Yuv goo...@levy.ch
On Jun 24, 5:35 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Can we try and get an idea of tasks that need to be done?
* The documentation [0] needs to be updated for Mercurial. I have
updated the Ubuntu docs [1] four weeks ago to about 90%. I don't know
about
On Jun 26, 12:15 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
* The documentation [0] needs to be updated for Mercurial. I have
updated the Ubuntu docs [1] four weeks ago to about 90%. I don't know
about the docs for other O/S.
Actually this is not a blocker for a stable release since the
end
Hullo Yuv,
Hullo Yuv,
On Jun 27, 4:49 am, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On Jun 26, 12:15 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Terry Duell has prompted this effort and has offered to do some of
the legwork.
Thank you, Terry!
I'm not sure if I can do all that is needed, but I certainly
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yuv goo...@levy.ch
Hi Terry,
On Jun 26, 7:13 pm, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I have tested a change to the CMakeLists.txt which runs hg log --
follow --style=changelog and writes to the file ChangeLog, pretty
much as
Hullo Yuv,
On Jun 27, 9:33 am, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Yes, the hg log command is the right way to generate the ChangeLog. I
am not sure it is a good idea to automate / integrate it in the cmake
build though. One of the things that become apparent when looking at
the ChangeLog between
Hullo Robert,
On Jun 27, 9:53 am, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yuv goo...@levy.ch
Yes, the hg log command is the right way to generate the ChangeLog. I
am not sure it is a good idea to automate / integrate it in the
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au
Hullo Robert,
On Jun 27, 9:53 am, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yuv goo...@levy.ch
Yes, the hg log command is the right
Hullo Robert
On Jun 27, 11:41 am, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au
You could scan it for author names and compare them to the AUTHORS
file, and error out if there are any committers not listed
Hullo Robert,
On Jun 27, 11:41 am, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
[snip]
So what we'll do is create a temporary file with a list of all
authors, and use fgrep -v to see if there's anyone in the log list
that isn't in the authors:
[snip]
I have tried your shell script but it seems
Hi Bruno,
On 24 Jun., 23:35, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Hi all, the current HG 'trunk' is overdue for a release. To do this
we need to create a '2010.2.0' branch and work on clearing up the
remaining bugs and various loose ends.
Any objections? Can we try and get an idea of tasks
34 matches
Mail list logo
