Am 12.07.2018 um 08:46 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
I know that PTGui is using dcraw, and there is nothing wrong with it. It is
also not true that dcraw will strip all dynamic range data. You can check
its possibilities here (https://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/)
PTGui uses only a fraction
HuginStitchProject.app needs to be in the same folder as Hugin.app.
If you open Terminal.app, copy this code and press enter, Hugin.app should
open (if you copied it to /Applications/Hugin/Hugin.app). Now try to stitch
a project with HuginStitchProject (where nothing happens).
/Applications/Hug
> PTGui uses only a fraction of that possibilities. I'd never shoot raw
> only for PTGui's raw import. It's not worth the hassle at all.
What is your suggested workflow then ?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:18 AM Erik Krause wrote:
> Am 12.07.2018 um 08:46 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
> > I know t
Am 12.07.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
What is your suggested workflow then ?
Use a decent raw converter and convert to 16 bit TIFF.
--
Erik Krause
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
A list of frequently aske
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:57:26 -0700, Albert Szostkiewicz wrote:
>> PTGui uses only a fraction of that possibilities. I'd never shoot raw
>> only for PTGui's raw import. It's not worth the hassle at all.
>
> What is your suggested workflow then ?
To be clear, you're using PTGui not merely to develop
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2018 08:45:47 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>
> > Other than the work required (which may be non-trivial, balanced
> > against the fact that the Hugin developers have other things they
> > want to do, not to mention lives outside of Hugin), there's no
> > reason Hugin couldn't d
> Use a decent raw converter and convert to 16 bit TIFF.
Could you elaborate please? what is your choice of converter that is giving
you best result ?
"decent converter" is not a suggestion.
Thanks.
> To be clear, you're using PTGui not merely to develop the raw images,
> but also to stitch/fuse
Am 12.07.2018 um 17:05 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
Could you elaborate please? what is your choice of converter that is giving
you best result ?
"decent converter" is not a suggestion.
I use Adobe Camera Raw, since I happen to own a Photoshop CS6 license.
Lightroom uses the same raw conversio
Ah yes, thx for reply.
I was looking at that as well. Adobe is using its own DNG converter
https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/adobe-dng-converter.html
I heard good things about it, but too bad for me that its only win/osx
again and it is yet again another layer of conversion. That is why i wa
