Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2240
Start time: Fri Jun 25 21:01:04 EDT 2010
End time: Fri Jun 25 21:03:02 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> It's unfortunate that the PPC64 SMT image is so tall; it makes weird
>>> vertical gaps on the prior page. :-\
>>
>> Maybe you can output to xml, strip half of the numa nodes, and re-render
>> it. That's want I actually do for Hagrid.
Better
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 12:58:08 -0400, a écrit :
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> > > I'm uneasy with “PU#15, for example, changes location from NUMA node
> > > #0 to #1.” The location doesn't have really changed, PUs have just
> > > been renumbered.
>
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> > I'm uneasy with “PU#15, for example, changes location from NUMA node
> > #0 to #1.” The location doesn't have really changed, PUs have just
> > been renumbered.
How's this:
Notice that hwloc only sees half the PUs when SMT is disab
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I'm uneasy with “PU#15, for example, changes location from NUMA node
> #0 to #1.” The location doesn't have really changed, PUs have just
> been renumbered.
Good point; I'll clarify that.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate leg
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > It's unfortunate that the PPC64 SMT image is so tall; it makes weird
> > vertical gaps on the prior page. :-\
>
> Maybe you can output to xml, strip half of the numa nodes, and re-render
> it. That's want I actually do for Hagrid.
Good p
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 12:13:22 -0400, a écrit :
> Rather than sending another huge attachment, here's another copy, including
> all the XML and some images from the IBM PPC64 machine in a new "portability"
> subsection:
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/hwloc/hwloc-chap1-previ
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 12:13:22 -0400, a écrit :
> It's unfortunate that the PPC64 SMT image is so tall; it makes weird vertical
> gaps on the prior page. :-\
Maybe you can output to xml, strip half of the numa nodes, and re-render
it. That's want I actually do for Hagrid.
Samuel
Rather than sending another huge attachment, here's another copy, including all
the XML and some images from the IBM PPC64 machine in a new "portability"
subsection:
http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/hwloc/hwloc-chap1-preview.pdf
This is a temporary link; it will likely disappear after you
Hello Jorge,
I've just noticed Servet in the ipdps 2010 proceedings. There
are probably interesting things to do between Servet and hwloc
http://www.open-mpi.org/projects/hwloc/
On one hand, servet could use hwloc to get binding implementations
on various OSes. Indeed, Servet version 1.0 actual
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 10:46:59 -0400, a écrit :
> Before I do the other two, how does this look, formatting-wise? (see
> attached)
This looks good to me.
Samuel
Thanks!
I guess I should have expected that the output would be *huge*.
Before I do the other two, how does this look, formatting-wise? (see attached)
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 10:03:10 -0400, a écrit :
> > While I'm updating the
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 10:03:10 -0400, a écrit :
> While I'm updating the docs in this area, can you guys send XML output for
> dudley, hagrid, and emmett?
Here they are.
Samuel
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> It shows all processes only if -a is given. Otherwise, only processes
> that are bound to something are shown.
Ya; I found that later in the man page. I'll clarify the opening statements a
bit.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporat
While I'm updating the docs in this area, can you guys send XML output for
dudley, hagrid, and emmett?
I just recently did an internal project here in cisco where it was convenient
to use the XML output from lstopo rather than the C API (it was a
perl-script-based thing). So we might as well l
Le 25/06/2010 15:50, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
On Jun 25, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
% ./utils/hwloc-ps
I guess it just means you don't have any process bound to some proc.
Ah -- the documentation says:
hwloc-ps
hwloc-ps lists all processes currently running on
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 09:50:05 -0400, a écrit :
> Sounds like this is just a doc bug, right? If so, I can fix.
Probably, yes, please do.
Samuel
On Jun 25, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > % ./utils/hwloc-ps
>
> I guess it just means you don't have any process bound to some proc.
Ah -- the documentation says:
hwloc-ps
hwloc-ps lists all processes currently running on the machine with their
corresponding binding according t
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 09:34:44 -0400, a écrit :
> I notice that hwloc-ps doesn't do anything on both OS X (Snow Leopard) and
> Linux (RHEL 5.4):
>
> -
> % ./utils/hwloc-ps
I guess it just means you don't have any process bound to some proc.
Samuel
I notice that hwloc-ps doesn't do anything on both OS X (Snow Leopard) and
Linux (RHEL 5.4):
-
% ./utils/hwloc-ps
% echo $status
0
%
-
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
20 matches
Mail list logo
