Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2440
Start time: Thu Sep 16 21:01:02 EDT 2010
End time: Thu Sep 16 21:03:02 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 16:57:01 +0200, a écrit :
> I'm just asking to rework the function interfaces a little bit to
> have things already cleanly separated for anybody who would feel like
> adding another OS support or parsing .dts files some day, I believe
> that shouldn't be too muc
(replying to Alexey's mail which got rejected from the list)
Le 16/09/2010 15:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
> On 16/09/10 21:58, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Le 16/09/2010 13:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
> >
> >> On 16/09/10 20:50, Brice Goglin wrote:
> >>
> >>> We'll likely apply
Alexey Kardashevskiy, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 15:57:47 +1000, a écrit :
> >>- where do I put IBM-specific code?
> >>
> >Is the device tree linux-specific ? If so, it can stay in linux file as
> >long as it's not 30k lines :) We already have both sysfs and
> >/proc/cpuinfo code there anyway.
>
> I
Le 16/09/2010 13:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
> On 16/09/10 20:50, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>
>> We'll likely apply it, we just need to figure out where to put it if
>> it's reusable for AIX.
>>
>>
>
> Good! And what is about messages coming twice in this maillist? Am I
> the only person who
On 16/09/10 20:50, Brice Goglin wrote:
We'll likely apply it, we just need to figure out where to put it if
it's reusable for AIX.
Good! And what is about messages coming twice in this maillist? Am I the
only person who experiences that? :)
Le 16/09/2010 11:00, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
> On 16/09/10 18:49, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>
>> Do you perhaps happen to know where it might be on AIX?
>>
>>
>
> No idea, sorry. So what do we do regarding the patch?
We'll likely apply it, we just need to figure out where to put it if
it'
On 16/09/10 18:49, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Do you perhaps happen to know where it might be on AIX?
No idea, sorry. So what do we do regarding the patch?
Alexey Kardashevskiy, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 15:57:47 +1000, a écrit :
> >Is the device tree linux-specific ? If so, it can stay in linux file as
> >long as it's not 30k lines :) We already have both sysfs and
> >/proc/cpuinfo code there anyway.
>
> It is powerpc-specific. It is mapped from the syste
Alexey Kardashevskiy, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 15:42:27 +1000, a écrit :
> On 16/09/10 15:29, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Alexey Kardashevskiy, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 14:10:08 +1000, a écrit :
> >
> >>1. Old kernels (RHEL5.*) do expose some numa nodes via sysfs but there
> >>is no information regarting cach
On 16/09/10 15:41, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 16/09/2010 06:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
2. The HWLOC expects numa nodes to be numbered consecutively, like
1-2-3-4-5 However this is not necessary true for PowerPC with
LPARs or on systems with numa hotswap (do they exist? don't know).
Please find the answers below.
On 16/09/10 15:29, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Alexey Kardashevskiy, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 14:10:08 +1000, a écrit :
1. Old kernels (RHEL5.*) do expose some numa nodes via sysfs but there
is no information regarting cache (L1/L2/L3) and CPU threads. RHEL6 does
that.
Le 16/09/2010 06:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> There are 2 problems with the current HWLOC code. The questions are at
> the bottom.
>
> 1. Old kernels (RHEL5.*) do expose some numa nodes via sysfs but there
> is no information regarting cache (L1/L2/L3) and CPU threads. RHEL6
> does
Alexey Kardashevskiy, le Thu 16 Sep 2010 14:10:08 +1000, a écrit :
> 1. Old kernels (RHEL5.*) do expose some numa nodes via sysfs but there
> is no information regarting cache (L1/L2/L3) and CPU threads. RHEL6 does
> that. The proposed patch parses PowerPC's /proc/device-tree and add
> necessary
Hi!
There are 2 problems with the current HWLOC code. The questions are at
the bottom.
1. Old kernels (RHEL5.*) do expose some numa nodes via sysfs but there
is no information regarting cache (L1/L2/L3) and CPU threads. RHEL6 does
that. The proposed patch parses PowerPC's /proc/device-tree a
15 matches
Mail list logo
