Re: [hwloc-devel] python bindings testing help needed

On 06/04/2013 03:52 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > (forgot to CC the list) > > > Le 04/06/2013 10:48, Brice Goglin a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Here are some slightly fixed tests. cuda/cudart/nvml look good. >> intel-mic looks good but I couldn't test on a real machine (I used XML >> instead), so the

Re: [hwloc-devel] First plugin namespace issue report

Le 04/06/2013 14:34, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > >> 2) custom test with ltdl: The program just silently fails to load hwloc >> symbols. Equivalent to passing the topology flag above. > > One option might be to try to

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

I know I'm not really an active member of the dev community, but I have experience with this from working on TORQUE (my full-time job). We switched to git (hosted on github) and it has been fantastic for us. I was familiar with git but hardly an expert when we changed over, and the same was true

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

Take a look at svn2git. It takes care of some the the tag/branch naming problems. If you use it make sure to pass the --metadata option to get the git-svn-id's in the commit messages. -Nathan On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > When I switched Open-MX and

Re: [hwloc-devel] First plugin namespace issue report

On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I take that back. Topology flags come too late, plugins are loaded > during the first topology_init(). Bummer. > We're back to things like "export HWLOC_PLUGINS_PATH=/none" Perhaps add a pre-init API to set flags like

Re: [hwloc-devel] First plugin namespace issue report

On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > 2) custom test with ltdl: The program just silently fails to load hwloc > symbols. Equivalent to passing the topology flag above. One option might be to try to lt_dlsym one of the hwloc symbols that you know you'll need

Re: [hwloc-devel] First plugin namespace issue report

Le 04/06/2013 14:11, Brice Goglin a écrit : > Adding topology flag to disable plugin may indeed be a nice workaround. > As long as the hwloc user doesn't need what's in plugin, things will > work fine. And I think things will work fine in the OpenCL case. > I take that back. Topology flags come

Re: [hwloc-devel] First plugin namespace issue report

(adding the list to CC) Le 04/06/2013 13:35, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:10 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > >>> I guess I'm asking - why can't that plugin link against an embedded >>> (non-DSO) hwloc? >> It can for sure. But if there's a hwloc

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: >> I'd like to explore converting all the old SVN log message mentions of >> "r" to git hashes. git-svn doesn't do that, right? > > No it doesn't afaik, and that would be nice. I know that MPICH went through this

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:23 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > When I switched Open-MX and KNEM from SVN to GIT, I basically just > pushed my git-svn clone. But I had to manually convert some svn > tags/branches. IIRC, the main reason is that git-svn has a strange way > to name svn

Re: [hwloc-devel] plugins inside plugin broken, as expected

On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > If only plugins and the core use these functions, the application does > not have to use -lhwloc-helper at all. If the application uses them > (e.g. bitmap functions), then it would have to use -lhwloc-helper, > but

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

When I switched Open-MX and KNEM from SVN to GIT, I basically just pushed my git-svn clone. But I had to manually convert some svn tags/branches. IIRC, the main reason is that git-svn has a strange way to name svn branches in git. We may also have to pass --authors-file to git svn clone so that

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

Ok. This is kinda what I assumed your response would be. :-) Let me talk to Dave Goodell later today, who just recently went through converting MPICH from SVN -> Git, and see what kinds of things we need to do to get the ball rolling here, and what kinds of dragons we should expect to

Re: [hwloc-devel] python bindings testing help needed

(forgot to CC the list) Le 04/06/2013 10:48, Brice Goglin a écrit : > Hello, > > Here are some slightly fixed tests. cuda/cudart/nvml look good. > intel-mic looks good but I couldn't test on a real machine (I used XML > instead), so the cpuset retrieving code wasn't tested. > > gl doesn't seem

Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?

+1000 ! I already use git-svn for most of my hwloc work. But I still need svn for backports, and that wastes a lot of my time. Brice "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" a écrit : >We're having a discussion (again :-) ) about moving OMPI to a DVCS. > >The short conclusion of the

[hwloc-devel] Move to git?

We're having a discussion (again :-) ) about moving OMPI to a DVCS. The short conclusion of the long conversation is: the OMPI dev community would be much more comfortable moving to a DVCS if they could see some success with other OMPI projects (e.g., hwloc and/or MTT). Would hwloc be