ERROR: Command returned a non-zero exist status (trunk):
make distcheck
Start time: Thu Dec 17 21:01:02 EST 2009
End time: Thu Dec 17 21:02:43 EST 2009
===
[... previous lines snipped ...]
make[2]: Entering directory
`
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 17 Dec 2009 07:51:34 -0500, a écrit :
> > > Re make check - I know it exists, but it was difficult to integrate the
> > > embedded test in with the existing "check" target because the embedded
> > > test
> > > effectively needs a full hwloc tarball to compile against.
> >
> >
On Dec 17, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I see you added some casts, too. ;)
>
> Yes, but carefully :p
Fair 'nuff. :-)
> > Re make check - I know it exists, but it was difficult to integrate the
> > embedded test in with the existing "check" target because the embedded test
> >
Huh. Coulda sworn that I fixed that one already. Bummer.
Thanks for the catch!
On Dec 17, 2009, at 7:31 AM, wrote:
> Author: sthibaul
> Date: 2009-12-17 07:31:37 EST (Thu, 17 Dec 2009)
> New Revision: 1506
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/1506
>
> Log:
> fix README gener
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 17 Dec 2009 05:33:45 -0600, a écrit :
> I see you added some casts, too. ;)
Yes, but carefully :p
> Re make check - I know it exists, but it was difficult to integrate the
> embedded test in with the existing "check" target because the embedded test
> effectively n
I see you added some casts, too. ;)
Re make check - I know it exists, but it was difficult to integrate the
embedded test in with the existing "check" target because the embedded test
effectively needs a full hwloc tarball to compile against. I played with making
a sym link from tests/embedded
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 16 Dec 2009 21:51:38 -0500, a écrit :
> On Dec 16, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > Ok, done. Please review:
> >
> >https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/1475
>
> I definitely broke something. :-(
I've fixed everything. Please note that these gcc warn
