Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2521
Start time: Tue Sep 28 21:01:02 EDT 2010
End time: Tue Sep 28 21:03:00 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Jeff, can you check on your Mac that lstopo from 1.0 works with libhwloc
> from the latest bitmap branch?
I had to fake out the VERSION information, but after doing that, it works. So
I think we're good.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
Le 28/09/2010 11:29, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Brice Goglin, le Fri 24 Sep 2010 13:31:06 +0200, a écrit :
>
>> By the way, what's the proper way to do the latter?
>> #pragma weak hwloc_cpuset_foo = hwloc_bitmap_foo ?
>> use __hwloc_attribute_alias instead ?
>>
> There is no proper way
Eh. Other than not liking it, is there a *problem* with the tarball getting
larger?
We could also make 2 tarballs if you really care - one with the tests and one
without.
Sent from my PDA. No type good.
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:28 AM, "Brice Goglin" wrote:
> The bz2
Brice Goglin, le Fri 24 Sep 2010 13:31:06 +0200, a écrit :
> By the way, what's the proper way to do the latter?
> #pragma weak hwloc_cpuset_foo = hwloc_bitmap_foo ?
> use __hwloc_attribute_alias instead ?
There is no proper way unfortunately: the Mach-O format used by MacOS
does not support such
Le 28/09/2010 10:26, Ashley Pittman a écrit :
> On 28 Sep 2010, at 07:27, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>> The bz2 tarball of hwloc 1.0.2 was 2.1MB. hwloc 1.1 will be at least
>> 2.7MB. I know that bandwidth is free, but I am still not confortable
>> with the size increasing that much.
>>
>> Any
On 28 Sep 2010, at 07:27, Brice Goglin wrote:
> The bz2 tarball of hwloc 1.0.2 was 2.1MB. hwloc 1.1 will be at least
> 2.7MB. I know that bandwidth is free, but I am still not confortable
> with the size increasing that much.
>
> Any other idea?
There is probably some mileage in simply
The bitmap branch looks good to me. There might still be some
documentation/comments to update, but nothing big. Given how intrusive
this branch is, I'd rather merge it early instead of fixing conflicts in
other branches for a long time :)
What I need first is somebody to check my pragma at the
The bz2 tarball of hwloc 1.0.2 was 2.1MB. hwloc 1.1 will be at least
2.7MB. I know that bandwidth is free, but I am still not confortable
with the size increasing that much.
Obviously, the problem comes from tarballs under tests/linux:
605774 28 sept. 08:12 tests/linux/256ppc-8n8s4t.tar.gz