[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1rc4r2871)
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1rc4r2871 Start time: Tue Nov 30 21:03:14 EST 2010 End time: Tue Nov 30 21:05:23 EST 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador
Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2875
bgog...@osl.iu.edu, le Tue 30 Nov 2010 18:22:29 +0100, a écrit : > 1) NO_PCI shows nothing > > And I wonder if we should make (1) the default for "backward compatibility". Possibly, yes. (but probably not in lstopo) Samuel
Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Guy Streeter wrote: > I am doing this manually. I think SWIG works fine for simple interfaces, but > this is pretty complicated. You might be right. This was simply an excuse for me to explore SWIG; I have no prior experience with it. :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
On 11/30/2010 10:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Guy Streeter wrote: Would anyone object if I take a whack at making some SWIG bindings for hwloc? I'm thinking specifically for perl (because that's my scripting language of choice), but I could probably be convinced to look at python as well. I'm currently working on a python bindings package for hwloc. I suppose I should find out how to get my code upstream. Great! Did you use SWIG, or do it manually? I am doing this manually. I think SWIG works fine for simple interfaces, but this is pretty complicated. I have enough of it working that I re-wrote hwloc-hello in python. I'm going to write python versions of all the tests next. --Guy
Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
Guy Streeter, le Tue 30 Nov 2010 17:48:56 +0100, a écrit : > On 11/30/2010 10:07 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >Would anyone object if I take a whack at making some SWIG bindings for > >hwloc? I'm thinking specifically for perl (because that's my scripting > >language of choice), but I could probably be convinced to look at python > >as well. > > > >(this would be for 1.2 at the earliest -- definitely not for 1.1) > > I'm currently working on a python bindings package for hwloc. I suppose I > should find out how to get my code upstream. Send a patch :) Samuel
Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Guy Streeter wrote: >> Would anyone object if I take a whack at making some SWIG bindings for >> hwloc? I'm thinking specifically for perl (because that's my scripting >> language of choice), but I could probably be convinced to look at python as >> well. > > I'm currently working on a python bindings package for hwloc. I suppose I > should find out how to get my code upstream. Great! Did you use SWIG, or do it manually? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Would anyone object if I take a whack at making some SWIG bindings for hwloc? > > I'd say it's welcome, as it'd easily bring bindings for other languages > as well. I'm unsure how our pointers in the hwloc_obj_t structure will > nicely map, however. Yes, that's on the "need to figure out" list. :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
Jeff Squyres, le Tue 30 Nov 2010 17:29:15 +0100, a écrit : > Would anyone object if I take a whack at making some SWIG bindings for hwloc? I'd say it's welcome, as it'd easily bring bindings for other languages as well. I'm unsure how our pointers in the hwloc_obj_t structure will nicely map, however. Samuel
[hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
Would anyone object if I take a whack at making some SWIG bindings for hwloc? I'm thinking specifically for perl (because that's my scripting language of choice), but I could probably be convinced to look at python as well. (this would be for 1.2 at the earliest -- definitely not for 1.1) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Yes, adding "p" to "#2" when showing physical indexes in the graphical > output exactly like we do for the textual output (which does not have > the legend). Ah, I see. > Some colleague even want to always have "P#" or "L#" and the legend to > make everything clear. I'm not opposed to P# and L# everywhere (i.e., capital P, so that we can use capital L), if it helps readability. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
Le 30/11/2010 15:20, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > >> I discussed with some "random" people about the "p" prefix in physical >> mode. It's not clear whether removing it from the graphical output is a >> good idea or not. People already have a hard time trying to understand >> all this logical/physical index stuff... >> > You mean in addition to the legend? > Yes, adding "p" to "#2" when showing physical indexes in the graphical output exactly like we do for the textual output (which does not have the legend). Some colleague even want to always have "P#" or "L#" and the legend to make everything clear. Brice
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I discussed with some "random" people about the "p" prefix in physical > mode. It's not clear whether removing it from the graphical output is a > good idea or not. People already have a hard time trying to understand > all this logical/physical index stuff... You mean in addition to the legend? > By the way, we talk about "index" instead of "ID" almost everywhere. So > should we use "index" in the legend too? Good call; can you fix? I'm in meetings all morning. :-( -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
Le 30/11/2010 15:03, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >>> How's this, instead? I made a few minor changes: >>> >>> - prefixed each line of the legend (the "physical IDs" line was confusing >>> to me without a prefix) >>> - fixed logic for terminating timestamp string >>> - moved all the legend logic inside "if (legend)" >>> >> That looks good to me. >> > Cool. Committed to trunk and v1.1. > > What's left for v1.1? > I discussed with some "random" people about the "p" prefix in physical mode. It's not clear whether removing it from the graphical output is a good idea or not. People already have a hard time trying to understand all this logical/physical index stuff... By the way, we talk about "index" instead of "ID" almost everywhere. So should we use "index" in the legend too? Brice
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> How's this, instead? I made a few minor changes: >> >> - prefixed each line of the legend (the "physical IDs" line was confusing to >> me without a prefix) >> - fixed logic for terminating timestamp string >> - moved all the legend logic inside "if (legend)" > > That looks good to me. Cool. Committed to trunk and v1.1. What's left for v1.1? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
Jeff Squyres, le Tue 30 Nov 2010 14:45:13 +0100, a écrit : > How's this, instead? I made a few minor changes: > > - prefixed each line of the legend (the "physical IDs" line was confusing to > me without a prefix) > - fixed logic for terminating timestamp string > - moved all the legend logic inside "if (legend)" That looks good to me. Samuel
Re: [hwloc-devel] multiline legend
How's this, instead? I made a few minor changes: - prefixed each line of the legend (the "physical IDs" line was confusing to me without a prefix) - fixed logic for terminating timestamp string - moved all the legend logic inside "if (legend)" On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Jeff, is the attached patch what you want? Lines should be small enough > on most machines now. > > Brice > > ___ > hwloc-devel mailing list > hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ multiline-legend-take-2.diff Description: Binary data
