Sorry for the delay in replying.
On Sep 29, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Now why do we still need a call to git-describe in get_version.sh? Isn't
> this script supposed to just read what distscript.csh did? (which would
> mean that "if test -z "$HWLOC_SNAPSHOT_VERSION" is useless).
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
[snip]
> The only branch that didn't have any tags at all was master, so I just
> created a "dev" tag on master, and that was sufficient.
Right, we plan to use the gitflow model in which master contains released
code and a "develo
Le 29/09/2013 14:00, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> Agreed. Let's have distscript.csh be the one that sets the
> git-describe value in VERSION (more below)
Ok thanks, much better.
Now why do we still need a call to git-describe in get_version.sh? Isn't
this script supposed to just read what
On Sep 28, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> I am watching with intense interest, as GASNet will be moving to git on Nov 1.
> Could you give me a pointer to where I can get copies all the scripts that
> you guys use for nightly tarballs, commit emails and such?
> I'll want to have look af
On Sep 28, 2013, at 8:12 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Let's go through the use cases of what we want:
>>
>> 1. "make dist" in a developer's git clone. This should make a "hwloc-> describe>.tar.*.
>
> This is actually the critical point, see below.
>
>> 2. make a nightly snapshot tarball. The m
Jeff,
I am watching with intense interest, as GASNet will be moving to git on Nov
1.
Could you give me a pointer to where I can get copies all the scripts that
you guys use for nightly tarballs, commit emails and such?
I'll want to have look after you have all the wrinkles ironed out to your
satis
Le 28/09/2013 13:30, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> Good catch; sorry about that. HWLOC_SVN_R no longer exists (as you
> noted). I just removed that 4th argument to distscript.csh. Now,
> distscript (on master and v1.7) only edits VERSION if snapshot=1 and
> snapshot_version is empty (i.e., if
On Sep 28, 2013, at 4:41 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I am having lots of problems when switching the regression testing stuff
> (jenkins) to git, mostly because of make dist. Actually it worked 2 days
> ago, no it breaks because hwloc-unknown.tar.* remain after make distcheck.
This means the versi
Jeff,
I am having lots of problems when switching the regression testing stuff
(jenkins) to git, mostly because of make dist. Actually it worked 2 days
ago, no it breaks because hwloc-unknown.tar.* remain after make distcheck.
1) There's something I don't understand in the dist scripts.
config/di
On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I don't think so. I am planning to only update the regression testing
> for v1.7 as well.
K.
> BUT what if the stable OMPI 1.6 needs a hwloc fix? Should we keep the
> hwloc v1.5 branch open?
E... let's cross that bridge when/if we need to.
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Fri 27 Sep 2013 15:36:33 +0200, a écrit :
> a) The last SVN nightly snapshot on the v1.7 branch was named
>hwloc-1.7.3rc1r5779.tar.bz2.
> b) The first git nightly snapshot on the v1.7 branch will be named
>hwloc-1.7.2-4-g3a6f84c.tar.bz2.
>
> Note "1.7.3rc1..."
Le 27/09/2013 15:36, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> I'd say that git and the new Trac are now fully open for business. I might
> still do some shifting around of tags (see below), but otherwise, I think
> everything is just about ready.
>
> I'm revamping make_dist_script and the nightly bui
I'd say that git and the new Trac are now fully open for business. I might
still do some shifting around of tags (see below), but otherwise, I think
everything is just about ready.
I'm revamping make_dist_script and the nightly build script; I should finally
be able to commit those today, if a
13 matches
Mail list logo
