On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> It shows all processes only if -a is given. Otherwise, only processes
> that are bound to something are shown.
Ya; I found that later in the man page. I'll clarify the opening statements a
bit.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporat
Le 25/06/2010 15:50, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
On Jun 25, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
% ./utils/hwloc-ps
I guess it just means you don't have any process bound to some proc.
Ah -- the documentation says:
hwloc-ps
hwloc-ps lists all processes currently running on
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 09:50:05 -0400, a écrit :
> Sounds like this is just a doc bug, right? If so, I can fix.
Probably, yes, please do.
Samuel
On Jun 25, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > % ./utils/hwloc-ps
>
> I guess it just means you don't have any process bound to some proc.
Ah -- the documentation says:
hwloc-ps
hwloc-ps lists all processes currently running on the machine with their
corresponding binding according t
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Jun 2010 09:34:44 -0400, a écrit :
> I notice that hwloc-ps doesn't do anything on both OS X (Snow Leopard) and
> Linux (RHEL 5.4):
>
> -
> % ./utils/hwloc-ps
I guess it just means you don't have any process bound to some proc.
Samuel
I notice that hwloc-ps doesn't do anything on both OS X (Snow Leopard) and
Linux (RHEL 5.4):
-
% ./utils/hwloc-ps
% echo $status
0
%
-
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
