-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/11/10 23:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Again, we are not talking about the ordering :)
> We are talking about the labels that we put on the
> figure, whether we want to show the actual physical
> IDs, or just the logical IDs
Apologies - I do mea
BTW, thanks for your input, we badly need it to make hwloc suit peoples'
need :) I often write terse critism mails, but that's mostly to make
sure we're going the right way :)
(BTW, I recommend reading lwn.net's series of articles on good & bad
design patterns).
Samuel
Christopher Samuel, le Wed 24 Nov 2010 06:50:18 +0100, a écrit :
> >> I'm not so sure, I would have thought that the graphical
> >> interface should default to what applications can see,
> >
> > Err, what do you mean by "what applications can see" ?
>
> Sorry, jet-lag - I just prefer that lstopo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/11/10 19:30, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Christopher Samuel, le Tue 23 Nov 2010 05:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
>> On 23/11/10 07:48, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, FWIW, I think I am in favor of switching to
>>> physical in graphic output by default
Christopher Samuel, le Tue 23 Nov 2010 05:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
> On 23/11/10 07:48, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
> > Anyway, FWIW, I think I am in favor of switching to
> > physical in graphic output by default.
>
> I'm not so sure, I would have thought that the graphical
> interface should default to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/11/10 07:48, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Anyway, FWIW, I think I am in favor of switching to
> physical in graphic output by default.
I'm not so sure, I would have thought that the graphical
interface should default to what applications can see, not
On Nov 22, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> It seems like the marketing guy was right when he talked about brainstorming?
Say it isn't so! ;-)
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
On Monday, November 22, 2010 11:24:19 pm Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jeff Squyres, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 21:54:04 +0100, a écrit :
> > Better yet -- include a legend/text explanation line (or even just a
> > title, "Physical|Logical numbering of processors in [hostname] at
> > [time/date]")
>
> That, ho
On Monday, November 22, 2010 07:47:32 pm Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jirka Hladky, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 19:28:43 +0100, a écrit :
> > What about adding the suggested legend:
> > "This graphics is using [physical|logical] numbering. See man hwloc for
> >
> > details."
> >
> > at the bottom of the grap
On Nov 22, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> yes, with hostname removed if isthissystem=0, or changed if HostName is
> available in the root->infos.
Good point.
We should probably also include the user's gravatar, too. ;-)
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal informat
Le 22/11/2010 23:24, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Jeff Squyres, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 21:54:04 +0100, a écrit :
>
>> Better yet -- include a legend/text explanation line (or even just a title,
>> "Physical|Logical numbering of processors in [hostname] at [time/date]")
>>
> That, however, can b
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 21:54:04 +0100, a écrit :
> Better yet -- include a legend/text explanation line (or even just a title,
> "Physical|Logical numbering of processors in [hostname] at [time/date]")
That, however, can be useful by default, yes.
Samuel
On Nov 22, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> We could also print a message in stdout:
> "Using physical/OS indexes by default in the graphic mode, use -l to
> revert to logical indexes"
> Anybody that may confuse logical/physical indexes will have to run
> hwloc-calc/bind from a terminal an
We could also print a message in stdout:
"Using physical/OS indexes by default in the graphic mode, use -l to
revert to logical indexes"
Anybody that may confuse logical/physical indexes will have to run
hwloc-calc/bind from a terminal anyway, so printing this lstopo message
to the terminal may h
On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> at the bottom of the graphics?
>
> Again, it makes it tedious to reuse it for other purpose. I'm expecting
> the user to have a look at the manual if he cares what L/P means.
I dunno -- cropping that out of an image is pretty easy. MS Offi
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 19:28:43 +0100, a écrit :
> What about adding the suggested legend:
>
> "This graphics is using [physical|logical] numbering. See man hwloc for
> details."
>
> at the bottom of the graphics?
Again, it makes it tedious to reuse it for other purpose. I'm expecti
On Monday, November 22, 2010 06:57:45 pm Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jirka Hladky, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 18:45:03 +0100, a écrit :
> > I would also like to ask you to consider adding the Title to the
> > graphical output so that users can distinguish easily if the graphics
> > was created with --physical
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 18:45:03 +0100, a écrit :
> I would also like to ask you to consider adding the Title to the graphical
> output so that users can distinguish easily if the graphics was created with
> --physical or --logical numbering.
>
> Adding single line to the top of graphic
On Monday, November 22, 2010 05:57:34 pm Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 17:33:15 +0100, a écrit :
> > > -- using "p" is a good way to indicate "physical". But IIRC, we didn't
> > > like "l" (for "logical") because it looks too much like 1 (one).
> > >
> > > I think w
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 17:33:15 +0100, a écrit :
> > -- using "p" is a good way to indicate "physical". But IIRC, we didn't
> > like "l" (for "logical") because it looks too much like 1 (one).
> >
> > I think we're open to having some kind of indication to denote "logical"
> > in
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 15:56:09 +0100, a écrit :
> Hmm, yes, this is a good topic. I think we had this discussion a while ago
Yes, we have, and we had thought p would be enough, but apparently it is
not.
> -- using "p" is a good way to indicate "physical". But IIRC, we didn't like
>
On Nov 18, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> But what do we want to add?
>
> When we changed the default, I was also quite concerned by -p not being
> the default any more, as that is what most administrators will actually
> want by default.
Sorry; I was at SC10 last week and my INBOX
Jirka Hladky, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 16:03:21 +0100, a écrit :
> On Thursday, November 18, 2010 03:55:35 pm Brice Goglin wrote:
> > > Could you please add the legend to the picture explaining which index was
> > > used?
> >
> > I guess it's possible.
> Oh, this would be great! Will it make it into 1.1
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 03:55:35 pm Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 18/11/2010 08:50, Jirka Hladky a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Red Hat would like to included hwloc in the upcoming version of the Red
> > Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1. There is Bugzilla 648593
> > [RFE] Include Portable Hardware Locali
Le 18/11/2010 08:50, Jirka Hladky a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Red Hat would like to included hwloc in the upcoming version of the Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 6.1. There is Bugzilla 648593
> [RFE] Include Portable Hardware Locality (hwloc) in RHEL
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648593
>
Hi all,
Red Hat would like to included hwloc in the upcoming version of the Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6.1. There is Bugzilla 648593
[RFE] Include Portable Hardware Locality (hwloc) in RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648593
to address this.
I got following input from the devel:
26 matches
Mail list logo
