On 27-set-09, at 15:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I've wondered how to implement topology changes indeed. AIX does
have a SIGRECONFIG signal for this, I don't know any support from
other OSes.
Maybe there's a inotify way to get such changes in Linux.
There is usually no inotify support for vi
Fawzi Mohamed, le Sun 27 Sep 2009 15:26:40 +0200, a écrit :
> thanks for the quick answers, so I think that the answer is for now
> you can on linux 2.6 if you use cpusets.
Yes, cpusets are supported IIRC.
> >>>I've wondered how to implement topology changes indeed. AIX does
> >>>have a SIGRECO
On 27-set-09, at 14:37, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Brice Goglin, le Sun 27 Sep 2009 14:18:54 +0200, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
but shouldn't it return the restricted topology (or have a method
that
returns the restricted topology).
It should already be the default. To get the whole sys
Brice Goglin, le Sun 27 Sep 2009 14:18:54 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> but shouldn't it return the restricted topology (or have a method that
> >> returns the restricted topology).
> >>
> >
> > It should already be the default. To get the whole system, see lstopo
> > --help
Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> but shouldn't it return the restricted topology (or have a method that
>> returns the restricted topology).
>>
>
> It should already be the default. To get the whole system, see lstopo
> --help: --whole-system
>
Maybe he's referring to when the process launcher
Fawzi Mohamed, le Sun 27 Sep 2009 14:09:59 +0200, a écrit :
> the topology load returns the topology of the whole system (I think),
Nope, else it's a bug :)
> but shouldn't it return the restricted topology (or have a method that
> returns the restricted topology).
It should already be the d
I had moved from libplpa to libtopology, and I just became aware of
this merge, great!
I was wondering if there was any thinking on how to cope with
processes that have been restricted to a subset of processes by syste/
launcher/...
the topology load returns the topology of the whole syste
