Le 28/07/2010 18:53, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> Actually no, but it's very hard to see :)
> lstopo - | egrep "(NUMA|Group)"
> shows that Group4#0 only contains Group3#0 and #1.
> Group3#2 is directly a child of the machine (the indentation is smaller).
>
>
For the record, this is caused by the
> To my opinion, the job hwloc does in forming "groups" is basically OK.
> Also the group content makes sense.
We're lucky that it somehow matches the physical ordering,
but it is really meaningless given the distance matrix.
That's why Group2 matches nothing in reality.
Group3 matches nothing as
Brice Goglin, le Thu 29 Jul 2010 13:01:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > To my opinion, the job hwloc does in forming "groups" is basically OK.
> > Also the group content makes sense.
>
> We're lucky that it somehow matches the physical ordering,
> but it is really meaningless given the distance matrix.
Jirka --
Just curious: what's Red Hat's plans for hwloc? Will hwloc be in Fedora and
RHEL? Or will hwloc be an EPEL? Or ...?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
