Brice Goglin, le Thu 07 Jan 2010 19:52:51 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Now, coming to semantic changes:
> > - The top node of the tree wouldn't necessarily be a system object.
> > Actually, having always the top object having the system type is not
> > providing any useful info
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Now, coming to semantic changes:
> - The top node of the tree wouldn't necessarily be a system object.
> Actually, having always the top object having the system type is not
> providing any useful information :)
And having the root object type vary from machine to syst
Hello,
Happy new year btw :D
Considering future network topology support, I believe we probably need
to fix a couple of things before releasing 1.0. Just to sum up the a
bunch of points that have been raised in the past months:
- there should be a way to have the complete toplogy in just one tr
